Challenges in the return of molecular tumor profiling results
Authors:
- Heinz-Josef LenzHLHeinz-Josef Lenz
- David W CraigDCDavid W Craig
- Kevin C JohnsonKJKevin C Johnson
- Roel VerhaakRVRoel Verhaak
- Oindrila BhattacharyyaOBOindrila Bhattacharyya
- Sara A ByronSBSara A Byron
- Cheryl WillmanCWCheryl Willman
- Lindsey KelleyLKLindsey Kelley
- Elizabeth B ClausECElizabeth B Claus
- Jeffrey TrentJTJeffrey Trent
- 10 September 2025
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 118 (5) , 776-782
Abstract
Next-generation sequencing has transformed cancer care by providing essential insights for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. However, variability in testing timing, reporting practices, and interpretation challenges limits its clinical impact. This article highlights key opportunities to optimize somatic reporting, emphasizing the importance of timely testing throughout the cancer care continuum to maximize the diagnostic and therapeutic relevance of findings. Technical factors such as test design, sequencing depth, and the use of liquid biopsy substantially influence result accuracy and interpretation, underscoring the need for careful integration with clinical history. Standardized reporting practices that clearly delineate diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic findings can enhance the clinical utility of next-generation sequencing results. Streamlined formats and curated clinical trial data further support actionable decision making. Additionally, direct patient engagement and education are essential for empowering patients to navigate genomic testing and make informed decisions about their care. By leveraging multidisciplinary tumor boards, decision-support tools, and emerging artificial intelligence technologies, clinicians can better navigate the complexities of somatic reports. Standardization and clarity in reporting are critical to advancing precision oncology, empowering providers and patients to make informed treatment decisions and improve outcomes.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute Patient Engagement in Cancer Sequencing Initiative, part of the Cancer Moonshot Initiative
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reporting of molecular test results from cell-free DNA analyses: expert consensus recommendations from the 2023 European Liquid Biopsy Society ctDNA WorkshopEBioMedicine, 2025
- Trends and Disparities in Next-Generation Sequencing in Metastatic Prostate and Urothelial CancersJAMA Network Open, 2024
- Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with advanced cancer in 2024: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working GroupAnnals of Oncology, 2024
- If it’s a target, it’s a pan-cancer target: Tissue is not the issueCancer Treatment Reviews, 2024
- Practical Considerations for the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Treatment of Patients With CancerJAMA Oncology, 2022
- Rethinking Patient Engagement in Cancer ResearchThe Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2022
- Neurotrophin Receptor KinaseThe Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2021
- Patients’ and Oncologists’ Knowledge and Expectations Regarding Tumor Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing: A Narrative ReviewThe Oncologist, 2021
- Challenges and opportunities of cfDNA analysis implementation in clinical practice: Perspective of the International Society of Liquid Biopsy (ISLB)Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2020
- Standards and Guidelines for the Interpretation and Reporting of Sequence Variants in CancerThe Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2017