Vascular closure devices in electrophysiology procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors:
- Leonardo M. KnijnikLKLeonardo M. Knijnik
- Birju R. RaoBRBirju R. Rao
- Soroosh KianiSKSoroosh Kiani
- David B. DeLurgioDDDavid B. DeLurgio
- Michael S. LloydMLMichael S. Lloyd
Open Access
- 8 May 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Heart Rhythm O2
- Vol. 7 (8) , 1456-1461
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Emory University
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Vascular access site management during electrophysiology procedures: a European Heart Rhythm Association surveyEP Europace, 2025
- Venous vascular closure system vs. figure-of-eight suture following atrial fibrillation ablation: the STYLE-AF StudyEP Europace, 2024
- Comparison of Figure-of-Eight Suture and Perclose ProGlide Suture-Mediated Closure in Large Bore Venous Access Hemostasis: A Randomized Controlled TrialThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2023
- Contemporary trends in cardiac electrophysiology procedures in the United States, and impact of a global pandemicHeart Rhythm O2, 2022
- Carbon footprint of atrial fibrillation catheter ablationEP Europace, 2022
- Percutaneous Vascular Closure Compared With Manual Compression in Atrial Fibrillation AblationJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2022
- Limited efficacy of a figure-of-eight suture for hemostasis after cryoballoon atrial fibrillation ablation with uninterrupted oral anticoagulantsJournal of Cardiology, 2020
- Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology ProceduresJACC: Clinical Electrophysiology, 2020
- Meta‐analysis of the difference of mediansBiometrical Journal, 2019
- Early ambulation after diagnostic transfemoral catheterisation: A systematic review and meta-analysisInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2014