Patient perspectives and barriers to effective home-based care in lymphatic filariasis: A mixed methods study from Puducherry, India
Open Access
- 13 January 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- Vol. 20 (1) , e0013903
Abstract
Morbidity Management and Disability Prevention (MMDP) remain an under-addressed component of lymphatic filariasis elimination. Despite the simplicity of the hygiene-based regimen, adherence to these practices remains low due to multiple barriers, exacerbating chronic suffering. As the primary role remains vested in the patients, this study explores their perspectives and barriers to home-based care to inform strategies to improve outcomes. This study employed a mixed-methods approach using an explanatory sequential design. The quantitative phase involved a cross-sectional survey of 321 adult patients from Puducherry and adjacent areas of Tamil Nadu, utilising a validated questionnaire informed by the Self-Management Assessment Scale (SeMaS) framework. The qualitative phase comprised 12 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and four focus group discussions (FGDs), with participants evenly distributed based on gender and health-seeking behaviours, and the data were analyzed using deductive thematic analysis. Only 46.4% of participants regularly practised home-based limb care. Morbidity management scores were significantly higher among patients with an income (p = 0.005) and regular healthcare visits (p < 0.001), and lower among those with grade 4 lymphedema (p < 0.001). Participants under 60 years (p < 0.001), women (p = 0.015), and those with higher grades of lymphedema (p < 0.001) perceived a higher disease burden. Key barriers pertaining to home-based care were identified in social support (84.7%), perceived disease burden (33.0%), and mental health issues (15%). Qualitative findings highlighted the interactions of socioeconomic, structural, and cultural factors, indicating the key role of structural factors alongside individual-level determinants like locus of control, self-efficacy, and emotional well-being. The findings underscore the need for a multifaceted approach that transcends individual-level interventions to include systemic reforms, such as policy integration, capacity building, and community-driven support mechanisms. Addressing the barriers holistically and tailoring the solutions addressing diverse disadvantaged groups can enhance adherence to morbidity management practices.Keywords
Funding Information
- ICMR-Vector Control Research Centre, Puducherry (IM 2233)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Methodological triangulation: an approach to understanding dataNurse Researcher, 2012
- Issues in Delivering Morbidity Management for Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination: A Study in Pondicherry, South IndiaThe Scientific World Journal, 2012
- The stigmata and discrimination experienced, in southern India, by cases of lymphatic filariasisPathogens and Global Health, 2010
- Global Elimination of Lymphatic Filariasis: Addressing the Public Health ProblemPLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, 2010
- A survey on foot care practices among filarial lymphoedema patients in Orissa, India.2007
- Understanding the community impact of lymphatic filariasis: a review of the sociocultural literature2007
- STEP: An intervention to address the issue of stigma related to leprosy in Southern NepalLeprosy Review, 2005
- Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanismsAnnals of Behavioral Medicine, 2003
- Poverty and health sector inequalities.2002
- Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.1999