Prediction of outcome based on trauma and injury severity score, IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury in the elderly
Open Access
- 1 September 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Asian Journal of Neurosurgery
- Vol. 16 (03) , 500-506
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the trauma and injury severity score (TRISS), IMPACT (international mission for prognosis and analysis of clinical trials), and CRASH (corticosteroid randomization after significant head injury) prognostic models for prediction of outcome after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the elderly following road traffic accident. Design: This was a prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: This was a prospective observational study on 104 elderly trauma patients who were admitted to tertiary care hospital, over a consecutive period of 18 months from December 2016 to May 2018. On the day of admission, data were collected from each patient to compute the TRISS, IMPACT, and CRASH and outcome evaluation was prospectively done at discharge, 14th day, and 6-month follow-up. Results: This study included 104 TBI patients with a mean age of 66.75 years and with a mortality rate of 32% and 45%, respectively, at discharge and at the end of 6 months. The predictive accuracies of the TRISS, CRASH (computed tomography), and IMPACT (core, extended, laboratory) were calculated using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves for the prediction of mortality. Best cutoff point for predicting mortality in elderly TBI patients using TRISS system was a score of ≤88 (sensitivity 94%, specificity of 80%, and area under ROC curve 0.95), similarly cutoff point under the CRASH at 14 days was score of >35 (100%, 80%, 0.958); for CRASH at 6 months, best cutoff point was at >84 (88%, 88%, 0.959); for IMPACT (core), it was >38 (88%, 93%, 0.976); for IMPACT (extended), it was >27 (91%, 89%, 0.968); and for IMPACT (lab), it was >41 (82%, 100%, 0.954). There were statistical differences among TRISS, CRASH (at 14 days and 6 months), and IMPACT (core, extended, lab) in terms of area under the ROC curve (P < 0.0001). Conclusion: IMPACT (core, extended) models were the strongest predictors of mortality in moderate-to-severe TBI when compared with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT (lab) models.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent trends in hospitalization and in-hospital mortality associated with traumatic brain injury in CanadaJournal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 2015
- External Validation of the CRASH and IMPACT Prognostic Models in Severe Traumatic Brain InjuryJournal of Neurotrauma, 2014
- Validation of the CRASH model in the prediction of 18-month mortality and unfavorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomyJournal of Neurosurgery, 2014
- Outcomes of traumatic brain injury in Hong Kong: Validation with the TRISS, CRASH, and IMPACT modelsJournal of Clinical Neuroscience, 2013
- Predicting Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development and International Validation of Prognostic Scores Based on Admission CharacteristicsPLOS Medicine, 2008
- Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patientsBMJ, 2008
- Prognosis and Clinical Trial Design in Traumatic Brain Injury: The IMPACT StudyJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- IMPACT Database of Traumatic Brain Injury: Design And DescriptionJournal of Neurotrauma, 2007
- Systematic review of prognostic models in traumatic brain injuryBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2006
- Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not validJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006