CiteSource: An R package for data-driven search strategy development and enhanced evidence synthesis reporting
Open Access
- 6 April 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Research Synthesis Methods
- Vol. 17 (5) , 1-19
Abstract
Evidence synthesis findings hinge upon well-designed, effective search strategies. When developing these strategies, evidence synthesis teams make multiple decisions (e.g., selecting information sources, developing search string architecture, and picking supplementary search methods) that directly affect the breadth of discovered evidence and thus evidence synthesis outcomes. Despite the number of decisions required when developing search strategies, limited guidance exists to inform these decisions using a data-driven approach. To help address this gap, we developed CiteSource, an R package and accompanying Shiny application, that supports data-driven search strategy development and reporting. CiteSource allows users to assign and retain metadata across three custom fields: source, label , and string to indicate where the records were found, what method or string was used to find them, and whether they were included after screening. CiteSource allows users to visually map the overlap between sets of records, create data summaries of citation records, and export citation records with the newly assigned metadata. CiteSource’s analysis and visualization outputs can be harnessed for a variety of use cases, such as optimizing literature source selection, honing and understanding the effectiveness of search strings, and evaluating the impacts of literature sources and supplementary search methods. Overall, CiteSource provides a tool for evidence synthesizers to make informed data-driven decisions that boost the efficiency, rigor, and transparency of search strategies and associated reporting.Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell systematic reviewsCampbell Systematic Reviews, 2024
- Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indicesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2024
- A suggested data structure for transparent and repeatable reporting of bibliographic searchingCampbell Systematic Reviews, 2022
- Efficient searching for NICE public health guidelines: Would using fewer sources still find the evidence?Research Synthesis Methods, 2022
- Making the case for librarian expertise to support evidence synthesis for the sustainable development goalsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2021
- Assessing the risk of bias in choice of search sources for environmental meta‐analysesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2020
- “It has no meaning to me.” How do researchers understand the effectiveness of literature searches? A qualitative analysis and preliminary typology of understandingsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2020
- Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analysesEcology and Evolution, 2020
- Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resourcesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2019
- Supplementary search methods were more effective and offered better value than bibliographic database searching: A case study from public health and environmental enhancementResearch Synthesis Methods, 2017