Can the metaphyseal anchored Metha short stem safely be revised with a standard CLS stem? A biomechanical analysis
- 9 May 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Orthopaedics
- Vol. 41 (12) , 2471-2477
Abstract
Short stem total hip arthroplasty (SHA) has gained increasing popularity as it conserves bone stock and is supposed to allow revision with a conventional stem. However, no study has evaluated whether the revision of a SHA with a standard total hip arthroplasty (THA) stem provides sufficient primary stability to allow osseous integration.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revision rate after short-stem total hip arthroplastyActa Orthopaedica, 2014
- Performance of the CLS Spotorno uncemented stem in the third decade after implantationThe Bone & Joint Journal, 2014
- Fixation of the shorter cementless GTS™ stem: biomechanical comparison between a conventional and an innovative implant designArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2014
- Primary stability of the Fitmore® stem: biomechanical comparisonInternational Orthopaedics, 2013
- Primary stability and strain distribution of cementless hip stems as a function of implant designClinical Biomechanics, 2012
- A Short Tapered Stem Reduces Intraoperative Complications in Primary Total Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2012
- Survival of the Cementless Spotorno® Stem in the Second DecadeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2009
- Biomechanical evaluation of two types of short-stemmed hip prostheses compared to the trust plate prosthesis by three-dimensional measurement of micromotionsClinical Biomechanics, 2009
- Primary rotational stability of cylindrical and conical revision hip stems as a function of femoral bone defects: An in vitro comparisonJournal of Biomechanics, 2008
- Three-dimensional primary stability of cementless femoral stemsClinical Biomechanics, 1997