Evaluating heart electrical activities and cardiac arrhythmias of Holstein cows during ageing by short‐term electrocardiography in comparison with 24‐hour holter‐monitoring
Open Access
- 15 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Veterinary Medicine and Science
- Vol. 7 (3) , 843-850
Abstract
Short‐term electrocardiography is one of the most suitable tools to study the electrical activity of the heart, but the use of a tool such as a Holter‐monitor with the ability to assess the long‐term of the heart electrical activity, can provide more accurate information about these activities by comparing the results. It is possible to understand the superiority of each over the other and the resulting differences. Therefore, 60 female Holstein cows in 10 age groups, including 1 day, 1, 3, 6 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 8 years were included in the study (6 heads in each age group). Electrocardiography (for 5 min) and Holter‐monitoring (for 24 hr) were performed from the entire study population. The Q, R and T amplitudes in electrocardiography were significantly higher than those in Holter‐monitoring. The P, R and T durations and P‐R, R‐R, Q‐T and S‐T intervals at all ages were significantly longer in the Holter‐monitoring than in the electrocardiographic method. The heart rate of animals was significantly lower in the 24‐hr Holter‐monitoring than in the short‐term electrocardiography. The trend of changes of all parameters was significant during ageing. Cardiac arrhythmias included sinus arrhythmia and sino‐atrial block, which were the most common cardiac arrhythmias in the 24‐hr Holter‐monitoring. It appears that long‐term Holter‐monitoring is a more reliable method than short‐term electrocardiography to assess cardiac arrhythmias. Additionally, the indicators of electrical activity of the heart (waves) in the Holter‐monitoring method are significantly different from short‐term electrocardiography, which is probably due to the collection of information over a long period and in non‐stressful situations. Furthermore, it appears that the use of the 24‐hr Holter‐monitoring method is preferable to the short‐term electrocardiography method to evaluate the electrical activity of the heart of cows at all ages.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Twenty-four hour Holter monitoring in finishing cattle housed outdoorsJournal of Veterinary Cardiology, 2017
- History of research in Japan on electrocardiography in the racehorseJournal of Equine Science, 2015
- Cardiac arrhythmias and electrolyte disturbances in colic horsesActa Veterinaria Scandinavica, 2014
- Long-term Electrocardiography Recording with Holter Monitoring in 15 DonkeysJournal of Equine Veterinary Science, 2014
- The pediatric electrocardiogramThe American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2008
- Stroking of different body regions by a human: Effects on behaviour and heart rate of dairy cowsApplied Animal Behaviour Science, 2008
- Heart rate variability in dairy cows—influences of breed and milking systemPhysiology & Behavior, 2005
- Effects of Pair Housing on Diurnal Rhythms of Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Miniature SwineExperimental Animals, 2004
- Heart rate variabilityPhysiology & Behavior, 2002
- ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS OF FREE-RANGING ROE DEER (CAPREOLUS CAPREOLUS)Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, 2001