Metabarcoding as a Tool in Characterizing Nordic Deep‐Sea and Arctic Benthic Ecosystems
Open Access
- 31 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Environmental DNA
- Vol. 8 (6) , e70392
Abstract
Deep‐sea and Arctic soft‐bottom organism communities remain severely underexplored. Sediment environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding can complement existing survey methods, but its ability to discriminate among habitats and to reliably assign taxa must be critically evaluated. Here, we analyzed sediment samples from 10 areas in the Nordic Seas and adjacent Arctic, including the Arctic Mid‐Ocean Ridge (AMOR), continental slope habitats, and abyssal environments. Four genetic markers targeting different organism components were used: prokaryotic 16S and eukaryotic 18S (V1‐V2 and V4 regions) rDNA, and the metazoan cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene. Our aims were to gain biodiversity insights for these habitats by (1) comparing markers for characterizing and discriminating between samples and habitats, and (2) evaluating the potential for extracting low‐rank (family to species) animal taxa to complement taxonomic inventories. Alpha diversity varied substantially between markers and sampling areas, reflecting ecological variability and methodological differences. In contrast, beta diversity patterns were robust and consistent. Multivariate analyses showed clear separation by area and depth: the included AMOR seamount constituted a distinct community, and Arctic samples showed strong structuring with depth. Depth and geographic position explained significant fractions of community variability across metabarcoding markers. Taxonomic assignment revealed complementary performance of 18S rDNA and COI: 18S rDNA excelled in meio‐ and macrofauna coverage and intermediate‐rank performance. Conversely, COI yielded higher resolution at species rank. In total, 479 unique metazoan taxa were identified at family rank or below, highlighting both current limitations and future potential of metabarcoding for biodiversity inventories in the region. Overall, we find that multi‐marker eDNA metabarcoding can reliably discriminate between soft‐bottom organism communities. When combined with taxonomic validation and standardized workflows, this provides a powerful complement to existing survey methodology for understudied assemblages in the Nordic Seas and on the AMOR and should be integrated with future surveys in the area.Keywords
Funding Information
- Norges Forskningsråd (340939)
- Norges Forskningsråd (319885)
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Environmental DNA Reveals Diverse and Depth‐Stratified Biodiversity in East Indian Ocean Submarine CanyonsEnvironmental DNA, 2026
- Investigating the diversity and spatiotemporal dynamics of eukaryotic communities in hydrothermal vents at the Central Indian Ridge using environmental DNA metabarcodingDeep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2026
- How many metazoan species live in the world’s largest mineral exploration region?Current Biology, 2023
- Beyond the tip of the seamount: Distinct megabenthic communities found beyond the charismatic summit sponge ground on an arctic seamount (Schulz Bank, Arctic Mid-Ocean Ridge)Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2022
- MIDORI2: A collection of quality controlled, preformatted, and regularly updated reference databases for taxonomic assignment of eukaryotic mitochondrial sequencesEnvironmental DNA, 2022
- Benthic eDNA metabarcoding provides accurate assessments of impact from oil extraction, and ecological insightsEcological Indicators, 2021
- The impact of DNA extract homogenization and replication on marine sediment metabarcoding diversity and heterogeneityEnvironmental DNA, 2021
- From metabarcoding to metaphylogeography: separating the wheat from the chaffEcological Applications, 2019
- Adapting metabarcoding-based benthic biomonitoring into routine marine ecological status assessment networksEcological Indicators, 2018
- Oceanographic setting and short-timescale environmental variability at an Arctic seamount sponge groundDeep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 2018