Bioactive luting cements on the adhesive interface of fiber post and root dentin: a comparative study of bond strength, water interaction, and enzymatic degradation
Authors:
- Tiago Carvalho dos SantosTSTiago Carvalho dos Santos
- Giovanna Speranza ZabeuGZGiovanna Speranza Zabeu
- Ana Carolina Almeida LimaALAna Carolina Almeida Lima
- Mylena Proença CostaMCMylena Proença Costa
- Marcela Rocha CarrilhoMCMarcela Rocha Carrilho
- Rafael Francisco Lia MondelliRMRafael Francisco Lia Mondelli
- Linda WangLWLinda Wang
Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by FapUNIFESP (SciELO) in Journal of Applied Oral Science
- Vol. 34, e20250576
Abstract
Innovative self-etching dental cements have been considered a versatile material with recent formulations incorporating bioactive additives. Objective This study analyzed the role of these ingredients in systems used for luting intracanal posts. Methodology Bond strength (BS), water sorption (WS), water solubility (WSB), and in situ zymography (IZ) were assessed. Three cements were tested: RelyX U200 (RU, bioactive-free control), RelyX Luting Plus (RL, fluoride-containing glass-ionomer), and BeautiCem SA (BC, S-PRG-based). Bond strength was evaluated in bovine root dentin (n=10) at the cervical, middle, and apical thirds at 7 days and 6 months. WS/WSB were assessed using 10 cement disks (10×1 mm) cycled through deionized water immersion (m1), desiccation (m2), and a second immersion (m3). For IZ, the specimens (n=3) were sectioned and incubated with fluorescein-conjugated gelatin for 48h at 37°C at both storage times (7 days and 6 months) for analysis by Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. Fluorescence intensity was quantified using Image J. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey’s test (p<0.05). Results RU presented the highest BS and the lowest WS/WSB, while RL showed the opposite trend. BC demonstrated intermediate performance with no statistical differences from the other materials. For all cements, the cervical third and the 6-month period yielded the highest BS values. WS/WSB were greater for the bioactive cements (BC, RL). IZ results aligned with BS findings, revealing suppressed enzymatic activity over time. Based on these results, it can be concluded that RU exhibited superior mechanical stability despite lacking bioactivity. Conclusion Among bioactive cements, BC emerged as an interesting alternative, offering improved bond strength, water stability, and bioactive potential compared to RL.Keywords
Funding Information
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (001)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (122675/2022-3)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (001)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (122675/2022-3)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effective luting agents for glass-fiber posts: A network meta-analysisDental Materials, 2023
- Inhibitory activity of S-PRG filler on collagen-bound MMPs and dentin matrix degradationJournal of Dentistry, 2022
- Influence of curing modes on conversion and shrinkage of dual-cure resin-cementsDental Materials, 2022
- Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indicationsJournal of Dentistry, 2021
- Bioactive dental materials—Do they exist and what does bioactivity mean?Dental Materials, 2018
- Inhibitory effect of resin composite containing S-PRG filler on Streptococcus mutans glucose metabolismJournal of Dentistry, 2018
- Evaluation of selected properties of a new root repair cement containing surface pre-reacted glass ionomer fillersClinical Oral Investigations, 2016
- Influence of 2% chlorhexidine digluconate on bond strength of a glass-fibre post luted with resin or glass-ionomer based cementJournal of Dentistry, 2014
- Sorption and solubility characteristics of self-adhesive resin cementsDental Materials, 2012
- Water sorption and solubility of dentin bonding agents light-cured with different light sourcesJournal of Dentistry, 2007