Do practitioner assessments agree with academic proxies for audit quality? Evidence from PCAOB and internal inspections
Author:
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Accounting and Economics
- Vol. 67 (1) , 144-174
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Audit Partner Perceptions of Post-Audit Review Mechanisms: An Examination of Internal Quality Reviews and PCAOB InspectionsAccounting Horizons, 2012
- Do Going Concern Audit Reports Protect Auditors from Litigation? A Simultaneous Equations ApproachThe Accounting Review, 2012
- National and Office‐Specific Measures of Auditor Industry Expertise and Effects on Audit QualityJournal of Accounting Research, 2010
- Non‐audit Service Fees and Audit Quality: The Impact of Auditor SpecializationJournal of Accounting Research, 2007
- Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic SchoolsJournal of Political Economy, 2005
- Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparisonJournal of Financial Economics, 2003
- Do Non–Audit Service Fees Impair Auditor Independence? Evidence from Going Concern Audit OpinionsJournal of Accounting Research, 2002
- The Political Economy of the Securities Act of 1933The Journal of Legal Studies, 2001
- Auditing Standards, Legal Liability, and Auditor WealthJournal of Political Economy, 1993
- The Theory of Economic RegulationThe Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 1971