Does Self-Rated Health Mean the Same Thing Across Socioeconomic Groups? Evidence From Biomarker Data
Authors:
- Jennifer Beam DowdJDJennifer Beam Dowd
- Anna ZajacovaAZAnna Zajacova
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Annals of Epidemiology
- Vol. 20 (10) , 743-749
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- The association between self-rated health and mortality in different socioeconomic groups in the GAZEL cohort studyInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2007
- Income-related reporting heterogeneity in self-assessed health: evidence from FranceHealth Economics, 2006
- Mortality prediction with a single general self-rated health questionJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2006
- Are there socioeconomic differences in responses to a commonly used self report measure of chronic illness?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2005
- When Mental Health Becomes Health: Age and the Shifting Meaning of Self‐Evaluations of General HealthThe Milbank Quarterly, 2005
- Cut-point shift and index shift in self-reported healthJournal of Health Economics, 2004
- The role of clinical risk factors in understanding self-rated healthAnnals of Epidemiology, 2004
- Self rated health: Is it as good a predictor of subsequent mortality among adults in lower as well as in higher social classes?Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2001
- Survival, Functional Limitations, and Self-rated Health in the NHANES I Epidemiologic Follow-up Study, 1992American Journal of Epidemiology, 2000
- Prediction of Creatinine Clearance from Serum CreatinineNephron, 1976