Complementary and alternative medicine use amongst Malaysian orthopaedic oncology patients
Open Access
- 17 October 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- Vol. 14 (1) , 1-11
Abstract
Although studies have shown that a large proportion of cancer patients use CAM, no study on CAM use amongst orthopaedic oncology patients has been published. Therefore, this study aims to determine the prevalence, characteristics and factors associated with CAM use amongst orthopaedic oncology patients. All consecutive consenting patients/parents who presented at the Orthopaedic Oncology Clinic, University Malaya Medical Centre (1st January to 31st December 2013) were interviewed using a structured questionnaire. Overall, one hundred sixty-eight of the 274 patients recruited (61.3%) had used CAM at some time during their current illness. The prevalence of CAM used was 68% (123/181) for patients with malignant tumours and 48.4% (45/93) for patients with benign tumours. The most popular CAMs were biological-based therapies (90.5%), followed by mind-body techniques (40.5%). The most frequently used biological therapies were mega/multivitamins (31%), snakehead (Chana striatus) (28%) and sea cucumber (Stichopus horrens) (18%); whereas prayers (31%) and holy water (13%) dominated the mind-body category. Common reasons for CAM use were to improve physical well-being (60.1%), try out everything that would help (59.5%) and to enhance wound-healing (39.3%). Independent predictors for CAM use in multivariate analysis were paediatric patients [OR 2.46; 95% CI 0.99–6.06; p = 0.05], malignant tumours [OR 1.90; 95% CI 1.12–3.25; p = 0.018] and patients who underwent surgery [OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.15–3.69; p = 0.015]. Majority patients started taking CAMs following suggestions from family members (53%) and friends (49%). Sixty-six percent of patients felt they actually benefitted from CAM and 83.3% were satisfied/very satisfied. Only 5 patients reported side-effects. Majority of CAM users planned to continue CAM use or recommend it to others. However, only 31.5% of patients disclosed their CAM usage to their doctors. This survey revealed a high prevalence of CAM usage amongst orthopaedic oncology patients, with majority patients expressing satisfaction towards CAM. Oncologists should proactively ask patients about CAM to prevent potential adverse effects, as most patients do not share this information with them.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- How Many Cancer Patients Use Complementary and Alternative MedicineIntegrative Cancer Therapies, 2011
- A qualitative exploration of Malaysian cancer patients' perspectives on cancer and its treatmentBMC Public Health, 2011
- Challenging issues in pediatric oncologyNature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2011
- Complementary and alternative medicine use in oncology: A questionnaire survey of patients and health care professionalsBMC Cancer, 2011
- A systematic review of the effectiveness of Chinese herbal medication in symptom management and improvement of quality of life in adult cancer patientsComplementary Therapies in Medicine, 2009
- Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage in Singaporean adult cancer patientsAnnals of Oncology, 2009
- Prevalence and parental perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine use by children with cancer in a multi‐ethnic Southeast Asian populationPediatric Blood & Cancer, 2008
- Use of complementary and alternative medicine by cancer patients at the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital, Enugu, NigeriaBMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2007
- Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Adults with Chronic Diseases: United States 2002The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 2006
- Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cancer patients: a European surveyAnnals of Oncology, 2005