Does the anticipation of compatible partner reactions facilitate action planning in joint tasks?
Author:
- 9 May 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 80 (4) , 464-486
Abstract
Observing another human’s actions influences action planning, but what about merely anticipating them? In joint action settings where a partner’s subsequent actions are a consequence of one’s own actions, such contingent partner reactions can be regarded as action effects. Therefore, just like automatic effects they might facilitate those of a person’s actions that overlap with them in relevant features. In Experiments 1 and 2, the spatial compatibility of contingent partner reactions was manipulated and compared with the influence of automatic effects. Experiment 1 used a simplistic scenario in which lateral keypress actions by the subject were responded to by mouse movements of a partner producing spatially compatible or incompatible visual effects. Experiment 2 transferred the paradigm to a more complex task in which subjects manually relocated virtual objects on a multi-touch display, and these or other objects were subsequently manipulated by the partner. In Experiment 1, compatible partner reactions speeded up subjects’ preceding actions, whereas in Experiment 2 the influence was not statistically reliable. To test whether influences of partner reaction compatibility could be found in such naturalistic settings at all, Experiment 3 also used a multi-touch setting but varied temporal instead of spatial compatibility, which has several methodological advantages. This time, a compatibility effect emerged in subjects’ movement initiation times, whereas contrast effects were found for movement durations. These findings indicate that the principles of ideomotor action control can be extended to joint action settings. At the same time, they also emphasize the importance of task features in determining whether our own behaviour is influenced by anticipations of another person’s reactions.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MU 3749/1-1)
This publication has 69 references indexed in Scilit:
- I See What You Mean: How Attentional Selection Is Shaped by Ascribing Intentions to OthersPLOS ONE, 2012
- Explicit Learning of Arbitrary and Non-Arbitrary Action–Effect Relations in Adults and 4-Year-OldsFrontiers in Psychology, 2012
- A Non-Verbal Turing Test: Differentiating Mind from Machine in Gaze-Based Social InteractionPLOS ONE, 2011
- Principles of sensorimotor learningNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2011
- The joint flanker effect: sharing tasks with real and imagined co-actorsExperimental Brain Research, 2011
- Favouritism in the motor system: social interaction modulates action simulationBiology Letters, 2010
- Behavioral speed contagion: Automatic modulation of movement timing by observation of body movementsCognition, 2008
- Effects of agency on movement interference during observation of a moving dot stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2007
- Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences.Psychological Bulletin, 2007
- Grasping the Intentions of Others with One's Own Mirror Neuron SystemPLOS Biology, 2005