Pericapsular Nerve Group Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Analgesia in Newly Admitted Patients With Hip Fractures

Authors:
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the effects of preoperative pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus femoral nerve block (FNB) on pain in patients with hip fractures. Methods: Sixty eligible patients were randomized (1:1) to receive a PENG block or FNB. The primary endpoint was postblock pain assessed through the visual analog scale (VAS). Secondary endpoints included time to optimal ultrasound imaging, procedure duration, time to first rescue analgesic, 24-hour rescue analgesic consumption, postoperative recovery quality, vital signs, and adverse events. Results: At 30 minutes postblock, both resting VAS scores (0.0 [0.0, 1.2] vs. 1.1 [0.6, 1.8], P =0.020) and passive movement VAS scores (2.9 [1.7, 3.6] vs. 3.4 [2.7, 4.7], P =0.027) were significantly lower in the PENG group compared with the FNB group. At 12 hours postblock, resting VAS (3.0 [2.1, 4.0] vs. 2.3 [1.7, 2.6], P =0.006) and passive movement VAS (6.8 [5.1, 7.3] vs. 4.9 [4.1, 5.8], P =0.002) were higher in the PENG group. The PENG group achieved optimal ultrasound imaging faster, had an earlier time to first rescue analgesic, and required a greater total dose of rescue analgesics within 24 hours (all P <0.001). Procedure duration, vital signs, and recovery quality did not differ significantly. Discussion: PENG blocks outperform FNB in imaging speed and early pain control but yield a shorter block duration, thereby increasing 24-hour rescue analgesic demands.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: