The fragility of statistically significant findings in randomised controlled anaesthesiology trials: systematic review of the medical literature

This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:

• Replicability, Reproducibility, and Fragility of Research Findings—Ultimately, Caveat Emptor
  Anesthesia & Analgesia, 2016
• The Fragility Index in Multicenter Randomized Controlled Critical Care Trials*
  Critical Care Medicine, 2016
• The fragility of statistically significant findings from randomized trials in spine surgery: a systematic survey
  The Spine Journal, 2015
• Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine
  European Journal of Anaesthesiology, 2015
• The statistical significance of randomized controlled trial results is frequently fragile: a case for a Fragility Index
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
• The Prevention and Treatment of Missing Data in Clinical Trials
  New England Journal of Medicine, 2012
• The design and conduct of clinical trials to limit missing data
  Statistics in Medicine, 2012
• GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
• Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls
  BMJ, 2009
• Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward
  The Lancet, 2002