Use of Metformin in the Setting of Mild-to-Moderate Renal Insufficiency
Open Access
- 20 May 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by American Diabetes Association in Diabetes Care
- Vol. 34 (6) , 1431-1437
Abstract
A common clinical conundrum faces all U.S. practitioners treating patients with type 2 diabetes. Today’s U.S. Food and Drug Administration prescribing guidelines for metformin contraindicate its use in men and women with serum creatinine concentrations ≥1.5 and ≥1.4 mg/dL (≥132 and ≥123 µmol/L), respectively. In a patient tolerating and controlled with this medication, should it automatically be discontinued as the creatinine rises beyond these cut points over time? Stopping metformin often results in poorly controlled glycemia and/or the need for other agents with their own adverse-effect profiles. Moreover, is the now widespread use of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in lieu of serum creatinine levels creating even more confusion, especially in those with abnormalities in one but not the other indirect measure of renal function? Indeed, more than a decade and a half after metformin became available in the U.S., debate continues over the best approach in these settings (1–3). How many patients are unable to receive this medication on the basis of guidelines which, although well intentioned, are somewhat arbitrary and outdated based on modern assessments of renal status? There is some evidence that early treatment with metformin is associated with reduced cardiovascular morbidity and total mortality in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients (4). However, the data come from a small subgroup of a much larger trial. In contrast, despite multiple trials of intensive glucose control using a variety of glucose-lowering strategies, there is a paucity of data to support specific advantages with other agents on cardiovascular outcomes (5–7). In the original UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), 342 overweight patients with newly diagnosed diabetes were randomly assigned to metformin therapy (8). After a median period of 10 years, this subgroup experienced a 39% ( P = 0.010) risk reduction for myocardial infarction and a …Keywords
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Novel Assay of Metformin Levels in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Varying Levels of Renal FunctionDiabetes Care, 2010
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2010Diabetes Care, 2010
- Screening for Albuminuria Identifies Individuals at Increased Renal RiskJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Glucose Control and Vascular Complications in Veterans with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2009
- Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of TherapyDiabetes Care, 2009
- Metformin, Sulfonylureas, or Other Antidiabetes Drugs and the Risk of Lactic Acidosis or HypoglycemiaDiabetes Care, 2008
- 10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- A Comparison of Change in Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Nondiabetic Kidney DiseaseClinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2008
- Intensive Blood Glucose Control and Vascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Effects of Intensive Glucose Lowering in Type 2 DiabetesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008