Effects of light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma on the PVER amplitude‐check size function curve
Authors:
- 1 October 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Acta Ophthalmologica
- Vol. 71 (5) , 606-615
Abstract
We analyzed the effects of various stimulus parameters, ie, light scatter, defocusing, mean luminosity, contrast, and central scotoma, on the normal pattern reversal visual evoked response (PVER), amplitudecheck size function curve in six normal subjects. The steady‐state PVER was recorded with five check sizes ranging from 160 to 10 min in 1‐octave increments. The PVER amplitude, especially with the smaller check sizes, was markedly decreased by light scatter induced by acrylic sheets. The function curve quickly changed to a low pass filter shape when +2.0 diopters of defocus were added, with the decrease most marked in the small check sizes. When the mean luminosity was decreased, the function curve maintained its normal inverted‐U shape up to 5 cd/m2, but the shape flattened with lower luminosity. Amplitude decreases were seen with all check sizes in low luminosity. With contrast changes from 95 to 24%, the function curve maintained its normal shape, but with slightly reduced amplitudes. The amplitude decrease was moderate even with the lowest contrast. With a two‐degree central scotoma, the PVER amplitude was reduced more with the smaller than the larger check sizes. The function curve became somewhat flatter, with its peak shifting to the larger check sizes. Results indicated that the shape of the PVER amplitude‐check size function curve changes in response to different modes of stimulation.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Contrast visual acuities in cataract patientsActa Ophthalmologica, 1992
- A new glare test based on low contrast letters — Evaluation in cataract patientsActa Ophthalmologica, 1990
- Effect of Optical Defocus on the Steady State Pattern Reversal Visual-Evoked ResponseOphthalmic Research, 1990
- An Objective VER Assessment of Visual Acuity Compared with Subjective MeasuresOptometry and Vision Science, 1988
- Pattern-Reversal Visual-Evoked Potentials in the Diagnosis of Amblyopia in ChildrenAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology, 1986
- Objective evaluation of binocular function using the pattern reversal visual evoked response. II. Effect of mean luminosityActa Ophthalmologica, 1986
- THE VER AS A PREDICTOR OF NORMAL VISUAL ACUITY IN THE ADULT HUMAN EYEOphthalmic and Physiological Optics, 1985
- Theoretical Reliability of Visual Evoked Response-Based Acuity DeterminationsOptometry and Vision Science, 1985
- Macula and periphery: Their contributions to the visual evoked potentials (VEP) in humansGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1980
- Comparison of contrast thresholds of large bars and checks measured by VECPs and psychophysically as a function of defocusingGraefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 1979