Environmental Implications of Eco-Labeling for Rice Farming Systems
Open Access
- 2 April 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 10 (4) , 1050
Abstract
Concerns about climate change have forced countries to strengthen regulations, standards, and certifications related to greenhouse gas emissions. Various policies targeting farm products, such as carbon labeling and the Environmentally-Friendly Agricultural Product Certification (EFAPC) for agricultural products, have been implemented in South Korea to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the agricultural sector. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implications of the various certification systems for rice farming, including organic farming, non-pesticide farming, and low-pesticide farming. For this study, we constructed a life cycle inventory (LCI) of rice farming systems including conventional, low-pesticide, non-pesticide, and organic farming systems in South Korea. Finally, we compared international farming systems in South Korea, the U.S., and the EU. The rice farming systems with eco-labeling certifications have reduced the environmental impacts. The environmental impacts of rice farming by country were highest in the U.S. (100.0), followed by the EU (53.7), and Korea’s conventional (48.6), low-pesticide (35.8), non-pesticide (28.9), and organic (16.7) farming practices. These results may be useful in proliferating and improving the methodology to evaluate eco-labeling and carbon labeling systems.Keywords
Funding Information
- the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2012R1A1A1015755)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Study on Evaluation of Carbon Emission and Sequestration in Pear OrchardKorean Journal of Environmental Biology, 2016
- Redefining payments for environmental servicesEcological Economics, 2012
- Predicting and mitigating the net greenhouse gas emissions of crop rotations in Western EuropeAgricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2011
- Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: food and agricultureThe Lancet, 2009
- Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: overview and implications for policy makersThe Lancet, 2009
- Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculturePhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007
- Are the costs of reducing greenhouse gases from passenger vehicles negative?Journal of Urban Economics, 2007
- Policy and technological constraints to implementation of greenhouse gas mitigation options in agricultureAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2007
- Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodologyEuropean Journal of Agronomy, 2004
- Economic Instruments and Environmental Policy in AgricultureCanadian Public Policy, 1998