Cumulative Incidence of False-Positive Results in Repeated, Multimodal Cancer Screening
Authors:
- J. M. CroswellJCJ. M. Croswell
- B. S. KramerBKB. S. Kramer
- A. R. KreimerAKA. R. Kreimer
- P. C. ProrokPPP. C. Prorok
- J.-L. XuJXJ.-L. Xu
- S. G. BakerSBS. G. Baker
- R. FagerstromRFR. Fagerstrom
- T. L. RileyTRT. L. Riley
- J. D. ClappJCJ. D. Clapp
- C. D. BergCBC. D. Berg
- J. K. GohaganJGJ. K. Gohagan
- G. L. AndrioleGAG. L. Andriole
- 1 May 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Annals of Family Medicine in The Annals of Family Medicine
- Vol. 7 (3) , 212-222
Abstract
Multiple cancer screening tests have been advocated for the general population; however, clinicians and patients are not always well-informed of screening burdens. We sought to determine the cumulative risk of a false-positive screening result and the resulting risk of a diagnostic procedure for an individual participating in a multimodal cancer screening program. Data were analyzed from the intervention arm of the ongoing Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, a randomized controlled trial to determine the effects of prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening on disease-specific mortality. The 68,436 participants, aged 55 to 74 years, were randomized to screening or usual care. Women received serial serum tests to detect cancer antigen 125 (CA-125), transvaginal sonograms, posteroanterior-view chest radiographs, and flexible sigmoidoscopies. Men received serial chest radiographs, flexible sigmoidoscopies, digital rectal examinations, and serum prostate-specific antigen tests. Fourteen screening examinations for each sex were possible during the 3-year screening period. After 14 tests, the cumulative risk of having at least 1 false-positive screening test is 60.4% (95% CI, 59.8%-61.0%) for men, and 48.8% (95% CI, 48.1%-49.4%) for women. The cumulative risk after 14 tests of undergoing an invasive diagnostic procedure prompted by a false-positive test is 28.5% (CI, 27.8%-29.3%) for men and 22.1% (95% CI, 21.4%-22.7%) for women. For an individual in a multimodal cancer screening trial, the risk of a false-positive finding is about 50% or greater by the 14th test. Physicians should educate patients about the likelihood of false positives and resulting diagnostic interventions when counseling about cancer screening.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Screening and Surveillance for the Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer and Adenomatous Polyps, 2008: A Joint Guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of RadiologyCA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2008
- Lead time associated with screening for prostate cancerInternational Journal of Cancer, 2003
- Baseline Findings of the Italian Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of "Once-Only Sigmoidoscopy"--SCOREJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Single flexible sigmoidoscopy screening to prevent colorectal cancer: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial of the National Cancer Institute: History, organization, and statusControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Design of the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trialControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Coordination and management of a large multicenter screening trial: The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trialControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Design and evolution of the data management systems in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trialControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Quality control of cancer screening examination procedures in the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trialControlled Clinical Trials, 2000
- Ovarian Volume Related to AgeGynecologic Oncology, 2000