Participatory methods for research prioritization in primary care: an analysis of the World Café approach in Ireland and the USA
Open Access
- 27 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 34 (3) , 278-284
Abstract
There are increasing imperatives for patients and members of the public to engage as partners in identifying health research priorities. The use of participatory methods to engage stakeholders in health care in research prioritization is not commonly reported. This article analyses the use of World Cafés as a participatory method for research prioritization with marginalized communities in Ireland and the USA. The principles of purposeful and snowball sampling were followed in both settings and a diverse range of community and health care stakeholders participated (n = 63 Ireland and n = 55 USA). The principles for a classic World Café were employed but there were novel features in each setting as well. Stewart et al.’s (Patients’ and clinicians’ research priorities. Health Expect 2011; 14: 439–48, conceptual framework for patient engagement was adapted and used to comparatively analyse the strengths and weaknesses of the World Cafés, focusing on agenda setting, engagement with research processes, interactional features and outputs. Design principles for World Cafés were found to align with high-quality patient engagement for research prioritization in both settings. They served to facilitate meaningful collaboration among stakeholder groups in research prioritization (research agenda setting) and explored research priorities (engagement with research). The café ambience, emphasis on hospitality and self-facilitation created an environment for dialogues within and across participating groups (interactional features). There was a commitment to follow-up actions with reference to possible subsequent research (outputs). The World Café is a valuable, participatory, flexible method that can be used with community and health care stakeholders for research prioritization with marginalized communities.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Limerick
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- How stakeholder participation can contribute to systematic reviews of complex interventionsJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2015
- Collaborative priority setting for human immunodeficiency virus rehabilitation research: A case reportCanadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2015
- Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized frameworkHealth Expectations, 2013
- Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and PracticeThe Milbank Quarterly, 2012
- Young, gifted, and caring: A project narrative of young carers, their mental health, and getting them involved in education, research and practiceInternational Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 2011
- Patients’ and clinicians’ research prioritiesHealth Expectations, 2010
- Patient defined dichotomous end points for remission and clinical improvement in ulcerative colitisGut, 2005
- Multiple Stakeholder Agreement on Desired Outcomes for Adolescents' Mental Health ServicesPsychiatric Services, 2004
- Illinois's child welfare research agenda: An approach to building consensus for practice-based research2003
- Participatory research maximises community and lay involvementBMJ, 1999