Skeletal Muscle Assessment Using Quantitative Ultrasound: A Narrative Review
Open Access
Abstract
Ultrasound (US) is an important imaging tool for skeletal muscle analysis. The advantages of US include point-of-care access, real-time imaging, cost-effectiveness, and absence of ionizing radiation. However, US can be highly dependent on the operator and/or US system, and a portion of the potentially useful information carried by raw sonographic data is discarded in image formation for routine qualitative US. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) methods provide analysis of the raw or post-processed data, revealing additional information about normal tissue structure and disease status. There are four QUS categories that can be used on muscle and are important to review. First, quantitative data derived from B-mode images can help determine the macrostructural anatomy and microstructural morphology of muscle tissues. Second, US elastography can provide information about muscle elasticity or stiffness through strain elastography or shear wave elastography (SWE). Strain elastography measures the induced tissue strain caused either by internal or external compression by tracking tissue displacement with detectable speckle in B-mode images of the examined tissue. SWE measures the speed of induced shear waves traveling through the tissue to estimate the tissue elasticity. These shear waves may be produced using external mechanical vibrations or internal “push pulse” ultrasound stimuli. Third, raw radiofrequency signal analyses provide estimates of fundamental tissue parameters, such as the speed of sound, attenuation coefficient, and backscatter coefficient, which correspond to information about muscle tissue microstructure and composition. Lastly, envelope statistical analyses apply various probability distributions to estimate the number density of scatterers and quantify coherent to incoherent signals, thus providing information about microstructural properties of muscle tissue. This review will examine these QUS techniques, published results on QUS evaluation of skeletal muscles, and the strengths and limitations of QUS in skeletal muscle analysis.Keywords
Funding Information
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX001388, I01BX005952, I01CX002118-01, R01AR075825, K01AR080257, W81XWH-20-1-0927, I01CX001388)
- National Institutes of Health (I01CX001388, I01BX005952, I01CX002118-01, R01AR075825, K01AR080257, W81XWH-20-1-0927, I01CX001388)
- U.S. Department of War (I01CX001388, I01BX005952, I01CX002118-01, R01AR075825, K01AR080257, W81XWH-20-1-0927, I01CX001388)
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01CX001388, I01BX005952, I01CX002118-01, R01AR075825, K01AR080257, W81XWH-20-1-0927, I01CX001388)
This publication has 122 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of shear wave elastography in skeletal muscleJournal of Biomechanics, 2013
- Application of Ultrasound in MedicineActa Informatica Medica, 2011
- Muscle architecture variations along the human semitendinosus and biceps femoris (long head) lengthJournal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 2010
- New normal values for quantitative muscle ultrasound: Obesity increases muscle echo intensityMuscle & Nerve, 2010
- Quantitative gray‐scale analysis in skeletal muscle ultrasound: A comparison study of two ultrasound devicesMuscle & Nerve, 2009
- Calibrated quantitative ultrasound imaging of skeletal muscle using backscatter analysisMuscle & Nerve, 2008
- Muscle ultrasound in neuromuscular disordersMuscle & Nerve, 2008
- Speed of sound reflects Young’s modulus as assessed by microstructural finite element analysisBone, 2000
- Ultrasound image properties influenced by abdominal wall thickness and compositionJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 1993
- Real‐time ultrasound imaging of musclesMuscle & Nerve, 1988