Evolution of total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years of age: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- 7 February 2022
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery
- Vol. 143 (2) , 1081-1094
Abstract
Introduction While surgical technique and implant technology for total hip arthroplasty (THA) has improved over the years, it is unclear whether recent progress has translated to improved clinical outcomes for young patients. The goal of this study is to determine trends in (1) indications, (2) surgical technique (3) clinical and radiographic outcomes, and (4) survivorship for THA in patients younger than 30 years of age. Methods MedLine, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched using several key phrases for articles focusing on THA performed on patients younger than 30 years of age between 1971 and 2020. A total of 34 qualifying articles were identified and stratified into three groups according to operative years and compared to one another on the basis of (1) indications; (2) fixation technique; (3) implant design; (4) clinical and radiographic outcomes; and (7) survivorship. Results The mean patient age at index THA were 20.5 (9–30), 22.1 (11–30) and 21.5 (10–30) years, respectively, for each study group. Over time, patients underwent fewer THAs for JRA (Juvenile Rheumatoid Arthritis) (p < 0.001) but more for post-treatment and iatrogenic avascular necrosis (p < 0.001; p < 0.001). Early THAs primarily used metal on UHMWPE (Ultra high molecular weight polyethylene) (71.7%, p < 0.001), modern THA predominantly use ceramic on HXLPE (Highly cross-linked polyethylene) (42.5%, p < 0.001). Early fixation methods used cement (60.4%, p < 0.001), and modern fixation primarily use press fit technology (95.9%, p < 0.001). Prevalence of radiographic loosening decreased significantly (p < 0.001) over time. There was no significant difference in clinical improvement on HHS. Lastly, fewer patients required THA revision in recent decades (p < 0.001). Conclusions Advances in surgical technique and technology have served to improve implant longevity. Surprisingly, subjective clinical scores showed no significant improvement over time, suggesting that early iterations of THA were extremely successful.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mean 5-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients under the Age of 30BioMed Research International, 2013
- Fracture of Ceramic Bearing Surfaces following Total Hip Replacement: A Systematic ReviewBioMed Research International, 2013
- Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years and the outcome of subsequent revisionsBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2013
- History and Systematic Review of Wear and Osteolysis Outcomes for First-generation Highly Crosslinked PolyethyleneClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- What Works Best, a Cemented or Cementless Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty?: Minimum 17-year Followup of a Randomized Controlled TrialClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2011
- Function and Fixation of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 25 Years of Age or YoungerClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Cemented Hip Designs are a Reasonable Option in Young PatientsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Nationwide Epidemiologic Survey of Idiopathic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral HeadClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- The John Charnley Award: Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing versus Large-diameter Head Metal-on-Metal Total Hip ArthroplastyClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2010
- Hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years: excellent ten to 16-year follow-up results with a HA-coated stemInternational Orthopaedics, 2007