Comparison of Investigator-Reported and Centrally Adjudicated Heart Failure Outcomes in the EMPEROR-Reduced Trial
Open Access
- 1 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in JACC: Heart Failure
- Vol. 11 (4) , 407-417
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2017 Cardiovascular and Stroke Endpoint Definitions for Clinical TrialsJACC, 2018
- A comparison of approaches for adjudicating outcomes in clinical trialsTrials, 2017
- Streamlining cardiovascular clinical trials to improve efficiency and generalisabilityHeart, 2017
- Centralized adjudication of cardiovascular end points in cardiovascular and noncardiovascular pharmacologic trials: A report from the Cardiac Safety Research ConsortiumAmerican Heart Journal, 2015
- Angiotensin–Neprilysin Inhibition versus Enalapril in Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Determination of hospitalization type by investigator case report form or adjudication committee in a large heart failure clinical trial (β-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial [BEST])American Heart Journal, 2010
- Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function taking angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Added trialThe Lancet, 2003
- A Randomized Trial of the Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker Valsartan in Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Effect of Carvedilol on Survival in Severe Chronic Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- TIME-DEPENDENT COVARIATES IN THE COX PROPORTIONAL-HAZARDS REGRESSION MODELAnnual Review of Public Health, 1999