Absence of Low-Level Visual Difference Between Canonical and Noncanonical Finger-Numeral Configurations
Authors:
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- Published by Hogrefe Publishing Group in Experimental Psychology
- Vol. 57 (3) , 202-207
Abstract
Canonical finger numeral configurations are named faster than less familiar finger configurations and activate a semantic place-coding representation as symbolic stimuli. However, this does not exclude categorically the possibility that mere visuo-perceptual differences between canonical and noncanonical finger configurations may induce differences in processing speed. This study capitalizes on the fact that, in typical visual-detection tasks, participants focus on low-level visuo-perceptual features to detect a target among distractors sharing the same high-level semantic features, producing the so-called pop-out effect. Participants had to decide whether a canonical finger configuration was present among a set of distractors expressing the same numerosity in a noncanonical way. The results showed that the time needed to detect the presence of the target grew linearly with the number of distractors. This indicates that the canonical target enjoyed no perceptual saliency among the noncanonical configurations (i.e., no pop-out effect) excluding visuo-perceptual differences as the source of the better identification of and semantic access of canonical configurations.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Finger counting: The missing tool?Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 2008
- Hand–object interaction in perspectiveNeuroscience Letters, 2008
- Masked priming effect with canonical finger numeral configurationsExperimental Brain Research, 2007
- Sensorimotor Learning Configures the Human Mirror SystemCurrent Biology, 2007
- Number magnitude potentiates action judgementsExperimental Brain Research, 2007
- Finger–digit compatibility in Arabic numeral processingQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2006
- The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learningTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2004
- Comment les enfants apprennent à calculer2003
- Task difficulty and the specificity of perceptual learningNature, 1997
- Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological studyExperimental Brain Research, 1992