Characterizing Spinal Decompression for Foot Drop Caused by Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohorts
Authors:
- Christian A. ThanCTChristian A. Than
- May Y. HajeirMHMay Y. Hajeir
- Lamees M. Al DarwashiLDLamees M. Al Darwashi
- Kelly SilnesKSKelly Silnes
- Aslam Mohamed HaroonAHAslam Mohamed Haroon
- Angelique K. ValiotisAVAngelique K. Valiotis
- Diana ShibibDSDiana Shibib
- Yasmine J. KhairYKYasmine J. Khair
- Hugh MilchemHMHugh Milchem
- Persidiu IancuPIPersidiu Iancu
- Zaher DannawiZDZaher Dannawi
Open Access
- 24 June 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 14 (13) , 4470
Abstract
Background/Objectives: There exists a need to capture the current landscape of the literature for lumbar decompression on muscle strength, as measured by manual muscle testing (MMT), in cohorts with foot drop secondary to lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from each database’s inception to 21 March 2025. Eligible studies reported patients with LDD-related foot drop treated surgically. This review was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42024550980). Results: A total of 20 studies comprising 918 patients met the eligibility criteria, with most cases attributable to lumbar disc herniation (79% of patients, 95% CI: 0.72–0.85, I2 = 96%) or spinal stenosis (22% of patients, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I2 = 96%). Following surgery, 60% of patients (95% CI: 0.44–0.75, I2 = 97%) achieved an MMT score of 4–5, indicating recovery, while 82% (95% CI: 0.76–0.88, I2 = 89%) demonstrated an improvement of at least one MMT grade. No improvement was seen in 18% of patients (95% CI: 0.12–0.24, I2 = 89%). For pain, the preoperative VAS mean was 5.91 (95% CI: 4.21–7.60, I2 = 99%), while the postoperative mean was 1.00 (95% CI: −0.05–2.06, I2 = 99%). Overall complications were reported at 1% (95% CI: −0.00–0.02, I2 = 0%). Conclusions: Lumbar decompression achieves clinically meaningful recovery of LDD-induced foot drop. However, this meta-analysis highlights the overlooked portion of patients who will not respond, providing a sequential approach for future investigation of these cohorts through foundational evidence of the present literature base.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prognostic factors and surgical outcomes of foot drop secondary to lumbar degenerative disease: A systematic review and Individual patient data meta-analysisEuropean Spine Journal, 2025
- Diagnosis and Management of Lumbar Spinal StenosisJAMA, 2022
- Surgical decompression timing for patients with foot drop from lumbar degenerative diseases: a meta-analysisEuropean Spine Journal, 2021
- Prognostic indicators of surgical outcome in painful foot drop: a systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Spine Journal, 2021
- Drop foot due to lumbar degenerative disease: Painless drop foot is difficult to recoverClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2021
- Acute bilateral foot drop with or without cauda equina syndrome—a case seriesActa Neurochirurgica, 2021
- Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of InterventionsCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019
- Prediction of Postoperative Clinical Recovery of Drop Foot Attributable to Lumbar Degenerative Diseases, via a Bayesian NetworkClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2016
- Foot drop resulting from degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: Clinical characteristics and prognosisClinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, 2014
- Meta-analysis in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1986