Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography
- 5 November 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
- Vol. 67A (4) , 1284-1293
Abstract
Alumina is a material that has been used in both dental and orthopedic applications. It is with these uses in mind that osteoblast (bone‐forming cell) function on alumina of varying particulate size, chemistry, and phase was tested in order to determine what formulation might be the most beneficial for bone regeneration. Specifically, in vitro osteoblast adhesion, proliferation, intracellular alkaline phosphatase activity, and calcium deposition was observed on delta‐phase nanospherical, alpha‐phase conventional spherical, and boehmite nanofiber alumina. Results showed for the first time increased osteoblast functions on the nanofiber alumina. Specifically, a 16% increase in osteoblast adhesion over nanophase spherical alumina and a 97% increase over conventional spherical alumina were found for nanofiber alumina after 2 h. A 29% increase in cell number after 5 days and up to a 57% greater amount of calcium was found on the surface of the nanofiber alumina compared with other alumina surfaces. Some of the possible explanations for such enhanced osteoblast behavior on nanofiber alumina may be attributed to chemistry, crystalline phase, and topography. Increased osteoblast function on nanofiber alumina suggests that it may be an ideal material for use in orthopedic and dental applications. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res 67A: 1284–1293, 2003Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms of Enhanced Osteoblast Adhesion on Nanophase Alumina Involve VitronectinTissue Engineering, 2001
- Effects of apatite and wollastonite containing glass-ceramic powder and two types of alumina powder in composites on osteoblastic differentiation of bone marrow cellsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2001
- Light Microscopic and Scanning Electron Microscopic Retrieval Analyses of Implanted Biomaterials Retrieved From Humans and Experimental AnimalsJournal of Oral Implantology, 2001
- Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramicsBiomaterials, 2000
- Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interfaceBiomaterials, 1999
- The Biologic Tissue Responses to Uncoated and Coated Implanted BiomaterialsAdvances in Dental Research, 1999
- Osteoblast population migration characteristics on substrates modified with immobilized adhesive peptidesBiomaterials, 1999
- Immunohistochemical evaluation of interface membranes from failed cemented and uncemented acetabular componentsJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1999
- Host Reactions to Biomaterials and Their Evaluation1996
- Mechanism of initial attachment of cells derived from human bone to commonly used prosthetic materials during cell cultureBiomaterials, 1994