Risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with blood culture contamination
- 26 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 43 (3) , 291-297
Abstract
Objective: To determine patient-specific risk factors and clinical outcomes associated with contaminated blood cultures.Design: A single-center, retrospective case-control risk factor and clinical outcome analysis performed on inpatients with blood cultures collected in the emergency department, 2014–2018. Patients with contaminated blood cultures (cases) were compared to patients with negative blood cultures (controls).Setting: A 509-bed tertiary-care university hospital.Methods: Risk factors independently associated with blood-culture contamination were determined using multivariable logistic regression. The impacts of contamination on clinical outcomes were assessed using linear regression, logistic regression, and generalized linear model with γ log link.Results: Of 13,782 blood cultures, 1,504 (10.9%) true positives were excluded, leaving 1,012 (7.3%) cases and 11,266 (81.7%) controls. The following factors were independently associated with blood-culture contamination: increasing age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01–1.01), black race (aOR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.15–1.51), increased body mass index (BMI; aOR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.02), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02–1.33), paralysis (aOR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.26–2.14) and sepsis plus shock (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.07–1.49). After controlling for age, race, BMI, and sepsis, blood-culture contamination increased length of stay (LOS; β = 1.24 ± 0.24; P < .0001), length of antibiotic treatment (LOT; β = 1.01 ± 0.20; P < .001), hospital charges (β = 0.22 ± 0.03; P < .0001), acute kidney injury (AKI; aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.40–1.83), echocardiogram orders (aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.30–1.75) and in-hospital mortality (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.31–2.16).Conclusions: These unique risk factors identify high-risk individuals for blood-culture contamination. After controlling for confounders, contamination significantly increased LOS, LOT, hospital charges, AKI, echocardiograms, and in-hospital mortality.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood culture contaminantsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2014
- Reducing Blood Culture Contamination in Community Hospital Emergency Departments: A Multicenter Evaluation of a Quality Improvement InterventionAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2014
- Reducing the Blood Culture Contamination Rate in a Pediatric Emergency Department and Subsequent Cost SavingsPediatrics, 2013
- A Critical Appraisal of the Role of the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory in the Diagnosis of Bloodstream InfectionsJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2011
- Clinical Impact of Blood Cultures Contaminated with Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci at an Academic Medical CenterInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2011
- Clinical and economic impact of contaminated blood cultures within the hospital settingJournal of Hospital Infection, 2011
- Impact of Blood Cultures Drawn by Phlebotomy on Contamination Rates and Health Care Costs in a Hospital Emergency DepartmentJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2009
- Peripheral blood culture contamination in adults and venepuncture technique: prospective cohort studyJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2007
- Updated Review of Blood Culture ContaminationClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2006
- Contaminant Blood Cultures and Resource UtilizationJAMA, 1991