Respectability and Relevance: Reflections on Richard Peters and analytic philosophy of education
Author:
- 21 January 2013
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Educational Philosophy and Theory
- Vol. 45 (2) , 191-201
Abstract
I argue that, after Dewey, Peters was the first modern philosopher of education to write material (in English) that was both philosophically respectable and relevant to the day-to-day concerns of teachers. Since then, some philosophers of education have remained (more or less) relevant but not really respectable while others have ‘taken off into the skies’ learning acclaim from the philosophical community but ceasing to produce anything which would be of any relevance to teachers in their work. I suggest that Peters might again point the way towards a form of academic philosophy of education that is both relevant and reasonably respectable.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Educational Neuroscience: A plea for radical scepticismEducational Philosophy and Theory, 2012
- Was Peters Nearly Right About Education?Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2009
- Democracy and education in a monetarist societyEducational Philosophy and Theory, 1995
- Scheid on PunishmentCanadian Journal of Philosophy, 1983
- Peters on SchoolingEducational Philosophy and Theory, 1977
- Education and the Philosophers: A Reply to J. P. PowellAustralian Journal of Education, 1966