Soil water flow dynamics in a managed cutover peat field, Quebec: Field and laboratory investigations
Authors:
- Susanne M. SchlotzhauerSSSusanne M. Schlotzhauer
- Jonathan S. PriceJPJonathan S. Price
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 35 (12) , 3675-3683
Abstract
In this paper concerned with soil water dynamics in a managed cutover peat field, the microscale hydrological processes and parameters governing water flow and storage through variably saturated peat are investigated. An open water ditch‐reservoir enhanced wetting of adjacent cutover peat, maintaining the water table depth above 43 cm during the summer, surface soil moisture above 45%, and water tension in the surface layer above −45 mbar. Desaturation of pores was noted in the −2 and −10 cm depths, but at −30 and −50 cm a decrease in moisture content of several percent was associated with compression of the peat as the water table dropped. Air entry occurred only at pressures below −15 mbar. Seasonal subsidence resulted in cumulative vertical displacement in excess of 10 cm during the study period. Typical settlements in the peat ranged between 11 and 23% of the lowering of the water table. Considerable hysteresis was observed, and vertical displacement was 5 times greater in response to water loss, compared to rewetting. The specific storage (Ss) in the 180 cm thick deposit averaged 9.4 × 10−4 cm−1 during drying periods but averaged only 2.6 × 10−4 cm−1 on rewetting.Ss was more important than specific yield (Sy) in the overall aquifer storativity. Transient hydraulic properties resulted from the shifting soil structure. The increase in peat bulk density caused by drying increased the water retention capacity and decreased hydraulic conductivity. Mean saturated hydraulic conductivity was 15 cm d−1 and decreased 2 orders of magnitude as the degree of saturation dropped from 1 to 0.4. The horizontal/vertical anisotropy ratio was 4. The changing surface elevation in response to seasonal subsidence had a profound influence on the nature of the storage changes and hydraulic parameters of the peat soil.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Soil water flow dynamics in a managed cutover peat field, Quebec: Field and laboratory investigationsWater Resources Research, 1999
- Floods, channel change, and the hyporheic zoneWater Resources Research, 1999
- Modeling Moisture Retention in Peat SoilsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1998
- Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bogJournal of Hydrology, 1997
- Effect of development and cultivation on physical properties of peat soils in New ZealandGeoderma, 1992
- Mechanisms of water storage in salt marsh sediments: The importance of dilationHydrological Processes, 1990
- Modeling of water balance, cracking and subsidence of clay soilsJournal of Hydrology, 1988
- Laboratory testing and in situ behaviour of peat as embankment foundationCanadian Geotechnical Journal, 1984
- Subsidence of low moor peat soils in the western NetherlandsGeoderma, 1977
- On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale ParametersMonthly Weather Review, 1972