Epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children: a follow-up one-year prospective survey of the French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF)
Authors:
- Claude EcoffeyClaude Ecoffey
- Gilles OrliaguetGilles Orliaguet
- ASSOCIATION DES ANESTHÉSISTES RÉANIMATEURS PÉDIATRIQUES D’EXPRESSION FRANÇAISE (ADARPEF)A(ASSOCIATION DES ANESTHÉSISTES RÉANIMATEURS PÉDIATRIQUES D’EXPRESSION FRANÇAISE (ADARPEF)
Top Cited Papers
- 22 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Pediatric Anesthesia
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1061-1069
Abstract
The French-Language Society of Paediatric Anaesthesiologists (ADARPEF) designed a 1-year prospective, multicenter and anonymous study to update both epidemiology and morbidity of regional anesthesia in children. From November 2005 to October 2006, data from participating hospitals were recorded using an identification form, a data recording form, and a complication form. Information collected included the characteristics of the hospitals, the number and type of regional anesthetics (RA), the age of the involved children as well as the incidence, and type of complications. Data collected in 47 institutions included 104,612 pure general anesthesias (GAs), 29,870 GAs associated with regional blocks, and 1262 pure regional blocks. Central blocks accounted for 34% of all RA. Peripheral blocks (66%) were upper or lower limb blocks (29% of peripheral blocks), trunk blocks, and face blocks (71%). In children aged ≤3 years, the percentage of central blocks was similar to the peripheral ones (45% vs 55), while in older children, peripheral blocks were more than four times used than central ones. Complications (41 involving 40 patients) were rare and usually minor. They did not result in any sequelae. The study revealed an overall rate of complication of 0.12%; CI 95% [0.09-0.17], significantly six times higher for central than for peripheral blocks. As a result of the low rate of complications, RA techniques have a good safety profile and can be used to provide postoperative analgesia. In addition, the results should encourage anesthesiologists to continue to use peripheral instead of central (including caudal) blocks as often as possible when appropriate.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Continuous peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative analgesia in children: feasibility and side effects in a cohort study of 339 cathetersCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2009
- Postoperative pain control for primary cleft lip repair in infants: is there an advantage in performing peripheral nerve blocks?Pediatric Anesthesia, 2008
- Paraplegia after thoracotomy under combined general and epidural anesthesia in a childPediatric Anesthesia, 2008
- Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blockade for Inpatient and Outpatient Postoperative Analgesia in ChildrenAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2007
- A review of pediatric regional anesthesia practice during a 17‐year period in a single institutionPediatric Anesthesia, 2007
- Continuous Epidural Block Versus Continuous Popliteal Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Relief After Major Podiatric Surgery in Children: A Prospective, Comparative Randomized StudyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2006
- Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks at Home for Treatment of Recurrent Complex Regional Pain Syndrome I in ChildrenAnesthesiology, 2005
- Sacral Osteomyelitis after Single-shot Epidural Anesthesia via the Caudal Approach in a ChildAnesthesiology, 2003
- Brachial plexus anaesthesia in childrenPediatric Anesthesia, 2001
- Epidemiology and Morbidity of Regional Anesthesia in ChildrenAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1996