How good are experienced interventional cardiologists at predicting the functional significance of intermediate or equivocal left main coronary artery stenoses?
- 1 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 120 (2) , 254-261
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incremental value of combined perfusion and function over perfusion alone by gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of severe three-vessel coronary artery diseaseJACC, 2003
- Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative angiography versus fractional flow reserve for native coronary narrowings of moderate severityThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2002
- How good are experienced cardiologists at predicting the hemodynamic severity of coronary stenoses when taking fractional flow reserve as the gold standardThe International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2002
- Noninvasive Tests in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2000
- Accuracy of dipyridamole SPECT imaging in identifying individual coronary stenoses and multivessel disease in women versus menJournal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2000
- Quantitative coronary angiography in predicting functional significance of stenoses in an unselected patient cohortJACC, 1995
- Left main coronary artery disease: Assessment, diagnosis, and therapyAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Relation between coronary artery stenosis assessed by visual, caliper, and computer methods and exercise capacity in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease. The Veterans Affairs ACME Investigators.Circulation, 1994
- Left main coronary artery stenosis: angiographic determination.Circulation, 1983