Super Extended Versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy for Bladder Cancer: A Comparative Study
Top Cited Papers
- 1 October 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 186 (4) , 1261-1268
Abstract
There is evidence from retrospective studies that radical cystectomy with extended pelvic lymph node dissection provides better staging and outcomes than limited lymph node dissection. However, the optimal limits of extended lymph node dissection remain unclear. We compared oncological outcomes at 2 cystectomy centers where 2 different extended lymph node dissection templates are practiced to determine whether removing lymphatic tissue up to the inferior mesenteric artery confers an additional survival advantage. Patients undergoing radical cystectomy and extended lymph node dissection with curative intent from 1985 to 2005 were included in analysis if they met certain criteria, including clinically organ confined urothelial bladder carcinoma (cN0M0), pathological stage pT2-pT3, negative surgical margins and no neoadjuvant therapy. Survival and recurrence data were analyzed. Demographic data and pathological subgroup distribution (pT2 and pT3) were similar in the 554 University of Southern California and 405 University of Bern patients. University of Southern California patients had higher median number of lymph nodes removed than University of Bern patients (38 vs 22, p <0.0001) and a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis (35% vs 28%, p = 0.02). However, the University of Southern California and University of Bern groups had similar 5-year recurrence-free survival for pT2pN0-2 (57% vs 67%) and pT3pN0-2 (32% vs 34%) disease (p = 0.55 and 0.44, respectively). The overall recurrence rate was equal at the 2 institutions (38%). Meticulous extended lymph node dissection up to the mid-upper third of the common iliac vessels appears to provide survival and recurrence outcomes similar to those of a super extended template up to the inferior mesenteric artery. Complete skeletonization in the extended lymph node dissection template is more important than nodal yield. This does not exclude the possibility that certain patient subgroups with suspicious nodes or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy may benefit from more extensive lymph node dissection.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Lymph Node-Negative Patients with Invasive Bladder CancerJapanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2009
- The Impact of Lymphadenectomy and Lymph Node Metastasis on the Outcomes of Radical Cystectomy for Bladder CancerEuropean Urology, 2009
- Outcome After Radical Cystectomy With Limited or Extended Pelvic Lymph Node DissectionJournal of Urology, 2008
- Lymphadenectomy in bladder cancer: How high is “high enough”?Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2006
- Standardization of Radical Cystectomy and Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Bladder Cancer: A Collaborative Group ReportJournal of Urology, 2004
- Extent of surgery and pathology evaluation has an impact on bladder cancer outcomes after radical cystectomyUrology, 2003
- IMPACT OF THE NUMBER OF LYMPH NODES RETRIEVED ON OUTCOME IN PATIENTS WITH MUSCLE INVASIVE BLADDER CANCERJournal of Urology, 2002
- Lymphadenectomy in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder; significance for staging and prognosisBJU International, 2000
- RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: EXTENDING THE LIMITS OF PELVIC LYMPH NODE DISSECTION IMPROVES SURVIVAL FOR PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER CONFINED TO THE BLADDER WALLJournal of Urology, 1998
- Management of Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Meticulous Pelvic Node Dissection Can Make a DifferenceJournal of Urology, 1982