Urgent coronary bypass surgery for failed percutaneous coronary intervention in the stent era: Is backup still necessary?
- 1 July 2001
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 142 (1) , 190-196
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduction in angioplasty complications after the introduction of coronary stents: Results from a consecutive series of 2242 patientsAmerican Heart Journal, 1996
- Effects of endoluminal coronary stents on the frequency of coronary artery bypass grafting after unsuccessful percutaneous transluminal coronary revascularizationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1996
- Coronary lesions at increased riskAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Stand-by versus stent-by during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyAmerican Heart Journal, 1995
- Predicting the risk of abrupt vessel closure after angioplasty in an individual patientJACC, 1994
- Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplastyJACC, 1993
- Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty without on-site surgical facilitiesThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Comparison of results of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with and without selective requirement of surgical standbyThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1992
- Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Failed Percutaneous Coronary AngioplastyAnnals of Surgery, 1992
- In-hospital cardiac mortality after acute closure after coronary angioplasty: Analysis of risk factors from 8,207 proceduresJACC, 1988