Temporal Processing Capacity in High-Level Visual Cortex Is Domain Specific
- 9 September 2015
- journal article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in The Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 35 (36) , 12412-12424
Abstract
Prevailing hierarchical models propose that temporal processing capacity—the amount of information that a brain region processes in a unit time—decreases at higher stages in the ventral stream regardless of domain. However, it is unknown if temporal processing capacities are domain general or domain specific in human high-level visual cortex. Using a novel fMRI paradigm, we measured temporal capacities of functional regions in high-level visual cortex. Contrary to hierarchical models, our data reveal domain-specific processing capacities as follows: (1) regions processing information from different domains have differential temporal capacities within each stage of the visual hierarchy and (2) domain-specific regions display the same temporal capacity regardless of their position in the processing hierarchy. In general, character-selective regions have the lowest capacity, face- and place-selective regions have an intermediate capacity, and body-selective regions have the highest capacity. Notably, domain-specific temporal processing capacities are not apparent in V1 and have perceptual implications. Behavioral testing revealed that the encoding capacity of body images is higher than that of characters, faces, and places, and there is a correspondence between peak encoding rates and cortical capacities for characters and bodies. The present evidence supports a model in which the natural statistics of temporal information in the visual world may affect domain-specific temporal processing and encoding capacities. These findings suggest that the functional organization of high-level visual cortex may be constrained by temporal characteristics of stimuli in the natural world, and this temporal capacity is a characteristic of domain-specific networks in high-level visual cortex. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Visual stimuli bombard us at different rates every day. For example, words and scenes are typically stationary and vary at slow rates. In contrast, bodies are dynamic and typically change at faster rates. Using a novel fMRI paradigm, we measured temporal processing capacities of functional regions in human high-level visual cortex. Contrary to prevailing theories, we find that different regions have different processing capacities, which have behavioral implications. In general, character-selective regions have the lowest capacity, face- and place-selective regions have an intermediate capacity, and body-selective regions have the highest capacity. These results suggest that temporal processing capacity is a characteristic of domain-specific networks in high-level visual cortex and contributes to the segregation of cortical regions.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word FormsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2011
- Not one extrastriate body area: Using anatomical landmarks, hMT+, and visual field maps to parcellate limb-selective activations in human lateral occipitotemporal cortexNeuroImage, 2011
- Sparsely-distributed organization of face and limb activations in human ventral temporal cortexNeuroImage, 2010
- Evidence for Highly Selective Neuronal Tuning to Whole Words in the “Visual Word Form Area”Neuron, 2009
- Detecting and remembering simultaneous pictures in a rapid serial visual presentation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
- The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortexProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human CortexThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2008
- Population receptive field estimates in human visual cortexNeuroImage, 2008
- The neural basis of visual body perceptionNature Reviews Neuroscience, 2007
- A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human BodyScience, 2001