Short-Term Effects of Mulligan Mobilization With Movement on Pain, Disability, and Kinematic Spinal Movements in Patients With Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National University of Health Sciences in Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics
- Vol. 38 (6) , 365-374
Abstract
The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the immediate- and short-term effects of lumbar Mulligan sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAGs) on patients with nonspecific low back pain with respect to 2 new kinematic algorithms (KA) for range of motion and speed as well as pain, functional disability, and kinesiophobia. This was a 2-armed randomized placebo-controlled trial. Subjects, blinded to allocation, were randomized to either a real-SNAG group (n = 16) or a sham-SNAG group (n = 16). All patients were treated during a single session of real/sham SNAG (3 × 6 repetitions) to the lumbar spine from a sitting position in a flexion direction. Two new KA from a validated kinematic spine model were used and recorded with an optoelectronic device. Pain at rest and during flexion as well as functional disability and kinesiophobia was recorded by self-reported measures. These outcomes were blindly evaluated before, after treatment, and at 2-week follow-up in both groups. Of 6 variables, 4 demonstrated significant improvement with moderate-to-large effect sizes (ES) in favor of the real-SNAG group: KA-R (P = .014, between-groups ES Cliff δ = -.52), pain at rest and during flexion (visual analog scale, P < .001; ES = -.73/-.75), and functional-disability (Oswestry Disability Index, P = .003 and ES = -.61). Kinesiophobia was not considered to be significant (Tampa scale, P = .03) but presented moderate ES = -.46. Kinematic algorithms for speed was not significantly different between groups (P = .118) with a small ES = -.33. All 6 outcome measures were significantly different (P ≤ .008) during within-group analysis (before and after treatment) only in the real-SNAG group. No serious or moderate adverse events were reported. This study showed evidence that lumbar spine SNAGs had a short-term favorable effect on KA-R, pain, and function in patients with nonspecific low back pain.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Investigation of the Effects of a Centrally Applied Lumbar Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide Mobilization on Lower Limb Sympathetic Nervous System Activity in Asymptomatic SubjectsJournal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 2012
- The Epidemiology of low back painBest Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- Exercise therapy for chronic nonspecific low-back painBest Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2010
- The effects of the Mulligan Sustained Natural Apophyseal Glide (SNAG) mobilisation in the lumbar flexion range of asymptomatic subjects as measured by the Zebris CMS20 3-D motion analysis systemBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 2008
- Mulligan's mobilization-with-movement, positional faults and pain relief: Current concepts from a critical review of literatureManual Therapy, 2007
- Low back pain (non-specific)Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 2007
- Diagnosis and treatment of low back painBMJ, 2006
- Mechanisms of Musculoskeletal PhysiotherapyPhysical Therapy Reviews, 2004
- Effectiveness of a Specific Physiotherapy Regimen on Patients with Tennis ElbowPhysiotherapy, 2002
- Forebrain-mediated sensitization of central pain pathways: ‘non-specific’ pain and a new image for MTManual Therapy, 2002