Beyond hostility: exploring facial emotion recognition biases in youths with conduct disorder
Authors:
- Janine BacherJBJanine Bacher
- Anka BernhardABAnka Bernhard
- Graeme FairchildGFGraeme Fairchild
- Lucres JansenLJLucres Jansen
- Stephane A. De BritoSBStephane A. De Brito
- Christine M. FreitagCFChristine M. Freitag
- Kerstin KonradKKKerstin Konrad
- Christina StadlerCSChristina Stadler
- Gregor KohlsGKGregor Kohls
- Eva UnternaehrerEUEva Unternaehrer
Open Access
- 27 August 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
- Vol. 35 (1) , 253-262
Abstract
Facial emotion recognition (FER) biases refer to systematic tendencies to recognize specific emotions when processing facial expressions. In youths with conduct disorder (CD), who are characterized by highly impairing antisocial behavior, research on FER biases has focused on hostile attribution biases. This work has shown that youths with CD perceive ambiguous social cues as angry. However, youths with CD may not only show biases towards anger, which is why we investigated FER biases in youths with CD towards the six basic emotions. Within the European FemNAT-CD study, we analyzed data from 610 youths with CD (60% female) and 818 typically developing controls (TDCs; 68% female), aged 9 to 18 years ( M = 14.1, SD = 2.41 years). FER biases were assessed using the Emotion Hexagon Task by showing morphed emotional expressions and asking participants to choose the predominant emotion. Biases were calculated as tendency towards an emotion shown at 0%, 10%, 30%, or 50% intensity. Our findings from hierarchical linear modelling indicate that youths with CD exhibited stronger FER biases than TDCs across all emotions, meaning that they misclassified each emotion more often. However, this difference varied by intensity, with youths with CD displaying weaker biases at higher intensity levels and a smaller increase in bias with increasing intensity level. Our findings indicate that youths with CD not only show a hostile attribution bias but rather misclassify emotions as predominant when they are present at low intensity, regardless of type of emotion.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Basel
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emotion recognition profiles in clusters of youth based on levels of callous-unemotional traits and reactive and proactive aggressionEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2022
- Analyzing Nested Data2020
- Investigating Sex Differences in Emotion Recognition, Learning, and Regulation Among Youths With Conduct DisorderJournal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2020
- Using Shrinkage in Multilevel Models to Understand IntersectionalityMethodology, 2019
- Emotional development through the lens of affective social competenceCurrent Opinion in Psychology, 2017
- Attentional bias for positive emotional stimuli: A meta-analytic investigation.Psychological Bulletin, 2016
- Investigation of the hostile attribution bias toward ambiguous facial cues in antisocial violent offendersEuropean Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 2013
- Young Offenders’ Emotion Recognition Dysfunction Across Emotion Intensities: Explaining Variation Using Psychopathic Traits, Conduct Disorder and Offense SeverityJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2013
- What do facial expressions convey: Feeling states, behavioral intentions, or actions requests?Emotion, 2003
- Predicting type of psychiatric disorder from Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) scores in child mental health clinics in London and DhakaEuropean Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 2000