Reassessing the Reliability of Advance Directives
Author:
- 1 January 1997
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
- Vol. 6 (3) , 325-338
Abstract
A competent patient has the right to refuse treatment necessary to sustain life. However, for many end-of-life decisions, we lack direct access to the wishes of a competent patient. Some treatment decisions near the end of life involve patients with severely diminished mental capacity (for example, Alzheimer's patients), some involve patients who are unable to communicate (for example, some stroke victims), and some involve patients who are simply unable or unwilling to participate in decisionmaking due to the nature or severity of their illness.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Practical Reason and Norms1999
- The Concept of Autonomy1998
- The nurse under physician authority.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1993
- Planning for Mental DisorderSocial Theory and Practice, 1992
- Advance Directives for Medical Care — A Case for Greater UseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Rationality and Dynamic Choice1990
- A History and Theory of Informed Consent. By Ruth R. Faden and Tom L. Beauchamp (with Nancy M. P. King) (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986. xv, 392p. $29.95).American Political Science Review, 1988
- The Many Faces of CompetencyHastings Center Report, 1985
- Bound to Treatment: The Ulysses ContractHastings Center Report, 1984
- Case Studies: Can a Subject Consent to a 'Ulysses Contract'?Hastings Center Report, 1982