Association between empiric combination therapy using antipseudomonal agents and in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: A propensity score-matched analysis
Authors:
- Hiroki IriyamaHIHiroki Iriyama
- Toshikazu AbeTAToshikazu Abe
- Taro ImaedaTITaro Imaeda
- Akira KomoriAKAkira Komori
- Takehiko OamiTOTakehiko Oami
- Tuerxun AizimuTATuerxun Aizimu
- Nozomi TakahashiNTNozomi Takahashi
- Yasuo YamaoYYYasuo Yamao
- Satoshi NakagawaSNSatoshi Nakagawa
- Hiroshi OguraHOHiroshi Ogura
- Yutaka UmemuraYUYutaka Umemura
- Asako MatsushimaAMAsako Matsushima
Open Access
- 2 January 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine
- Vol. 105 (1) , e47024
Abstract
Sepsis mortality due to drug-resistant organisms remains high. However, the effectiveness of empiric combination therapy for sepsis caused by potential drug-resistant gram‑negative bacilli remains debated. This was a nested case-control study using Japanese nationwide data from a medical reimbursement system between 2010 and 2017. The eligibility criteria were adult patients who were admitted to the intensive care unit, with new-onset sepsis at or after admission. We enrolled patients with combination therapy and monotherapy by propensity score matching using their baseline characteristics. We developed a logistic regression model including combination therapy, severity of organ dysfunction, and interaction terms as the adjusting variables. Overall, 7084 patients were included in this study, 3542 and 3542 of whom were enrolled in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively. The logistic regression model revealed combination therapy and moderate and severe organ dysfunction were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.52 [1.20–1.91], OR [95% CI]: 1.78 [1.43–2.23], and OR [95% CI]: 4.22 [2.61–6.81], respectively). Interaction between combination therapy and severe organ dysfunction was statistically significant (OR [95% CI]: 0.41 [0.21–0.80], P for interaction = .009). However, adjusted in-hospital mortality based on the model was not significantly different between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups among patients with severe organ dysfunction (44% [95% CI: 38–51] vs 47% [95% CI: 41–54]). Our results did not reveal any specific effectiveness of combination therapy; however, the significant interaction between combination therapy and severe organ dysfunction may indicate the possible survival benefit of combination therapy for severe sepsis subset.Keywords
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recent Experience With Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in Patients With CancerArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, Data Summary from January 1990-May 1999, Issued June 1999American Journal of Infection Control, 1999
- Factors Associated with Improved Outcome of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bacteremia in a Finnish University HospitalEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, 1998
- Bacterial Pathogens Isolated from Patients with Bloodstream Infection: Frequencies of Occurrence and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Patterns from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (United States and Canada, 1997)Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1998
- Meropenem versus Cefuroxime plus Gentamicin for Treatment of Serious Infections in Elderly PatientsAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 1998
- Antimicrobial Resistance Rates Among Aerobic Gram-Negative Bacilli Recovered from Patients in Intensive Care Units: Evaluation of a National Postmarketing Surveillance ProgramClinical Infectious Diseases, 1996
- [Prospective, randomized, controlled study of imipenem-cilastatin versus cefotaxime-amikacin in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infection and septicemia at intensive care units].1990
- ANTIMICROBIAL MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE INFECTIONS IN ABDOMINAL-SURGERY - SINGLE OR COMBINATION REGIMEN1990
- IMIPENEM CILASTATIN VERSUS AMINOGLYCOSIDE PLUS AMOXICILLIN PLUS CLINDAMYCIN IN THE TREATMENT OF SERIOUS POSTOPERATIVE INFECTIONS1987
- A Randomized Clinical Trial of Moxalactam Alone versus Tobramycin plus Clindamycin in Abdominal SepsisAnnals of Surgery, 1983