Comparison of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients ≥65 Years With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in The American Journal of Cardiology
- Vol. 114 (2) , 224-229
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Addition of Frailty and Disability to Cardiac Surgery Risk Scores Identifies Elderly Patients at High Risk of Mortality or Major MorbidityCirculation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes, 2012
- Accumulated Frailty Characteristics Predict Postoperative Discharge Institutionalization in the Geriatric PatientJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011
- Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical TrialsCirculation, 2011
- Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass GraftingCirculation, 2009
- Redefining Geriatric Preoperative Assessment Using Frailty, Disability and Co-MorbidityAnnals of Surgery, 2009
- The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 1—Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
- Drug-Eluting Stents vs. Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting in Multivessel Coronary DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: Immediate and seven-month outcomeThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
- Stroke After Coronary Artery BypassStroke, 2001
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987