Trends in pancreatic surgery in Switzerland: a survey and nationwide analysis over two decades
- 17 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery
- Vol. 407 (8) , 3423-3435
Abstract
Background Centralisation of highly specialised medicine (HSM) has changed practice and outcome in pancreatic surgery (PS) also in Switzerland. Fewer hospitals are allowed to perform pancreatic surgery according to nationally defined cut-offs. Objective We aimed to examine trends in PS in Switzerland. First, to assess opinions and expected trends among Swiss pancreatic surgeons in regard of PS practice and second, to assess the evolution of PS performance in Switzerland by a nationwide retrospective analysis. Methods First, a 26-item survey among all surgeons who performed PS in 2016 in Switzerland was performed. Then, nationwide data from 1998 to 2018 from all hospitals performing PS was analysed including centre volume, perioperative morbidity and mortality, surgical indications and utilisation of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS). The national cut-off for regulatory accredited volume centres (AVC) was ≥ 12. Additionally, an international benchmark definition for high volume (≥ 20 surgeries/year) was used. Results Among 25 surgeons from 15 centres (response rate 51%), the survey revealed agreement that centralisation is important to improve perioperative outcomes. Respondents agreed on a minimum case load per surgeon or centre. Within the nationwide database, 8534 pancreatic resections were identified. Most resections were performed for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (58.9%). There was a significant trend towards centralisation of PS with fewer non-accredited volume centres (nAVC) (36 in 1998 and 17 in 2018, p < 0.001) and more AVC (2 in 1998 and 18 in 2018, p < 0.001). A significantly higher adjusted mortality after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was observed in low-volume compared to high-volume hospitals (OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.15–1.84], p = 0.002) and a similar trend compared among AVC and nAVC (OR 1.25 [95% CI 0.98–1.60], p = 0.072), while mortality after distal pancreatectomy (DP) was not influenced by centre volume. Conclusions Over the last two decades, centralisation of PS towards higher-volume centres was observed in Switzerland with a decrease of mortality after PD and low mortality after DP. Further centralisation is supported by most pancreatic surgeons. However, the ideal metric and outcome measures for the allocation of highly specialised medicine need further discussion to allow a fair and outcome-focused allocation.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Operative Trends for Pancreatic Diseases in the USA: Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 1998–2011Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2016
- Impact of nationwide centralization of pancreaticoduodenectomy on hospital mortalityBritish Journal of Surgery, 2012
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the volume–outcome relationship in pancreatic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2011
- Identifying economic evaluations for health technology assessmentInternational Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2010
- Delayed gastric emptying (DGE) after pancreatic surgery: A suggested definition by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS)Surgery, 2007
- Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH)–An International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS) definitionSurgery, 2007
- Hospital Volume and Mortality After Pancreatic ResectionAnnals of Surgery, 2005
- Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definitionSurgery, 2005
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery, 1999