Parenteral Nutrition in Patients with Incurable Cancer: Exploring the Heterogenous and Non-Randomised Clinical Landscape
Authors:
- Marianne ErichsenMEMarianne Erichsen
- Tora S. SolheimTSTora S. Solheim
- Inger OttestadIOInger Ottestad
- Ingvild PaurIPIngvild Paur
- Rikka F. SandeRSRikka F. Sande
- Astrid NygaardANAstrid Nygaard
- Emilie H. MarkhusEMEmilie H. Markhus
- Lene ThoresenLTLene Thoresen
- Morten ThronæsMTMorten Thronæs
- Randi J. TangvikRTRandi J. Tangvik
- Kari SygnestveitKSKari Sygnestveit
- Patrik HanssonPHPatrik Hansson
Open Access
- 18 November 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Current Oncology
- Vol. 32 (11) , 644
Abstract
Background: There is an insufficient knowledge base for optimal parenteral nutrition (PN) use for patients with incurable cancer, leading to vague guidelines and varied practices. The aim of the study is to describe the practices and actual outcomes of PN in patients with incurable cancer at Norwegian hospitals. Methods: This multicentre study retrospectively reviewed 507 deceased patients (>18 years) receiving PN between 2011 and 2017. Data were collected from PN initiation until death, and analyses were descriptive. Results: Fifty-one percent had upper and lower gastrointestinal cancers, and the main PN indications were insufficient intake (75%) and gastrointestinal malfunction (47%). Sixty-seven percent received no anticancer treatment. Forty-three (8%) received PN as temporary bridging to anticancer treatment, of whom fifteen (35%) resumed or initiated treatment. The median PN dose corresponded to 53% of estimated energy requirements, and 94% of the patients had complementary energy intake. The most common reason for discontinuation was expected imminent death (47%). While common symptoms during PN were nausea (52%), vomiting (46%), and oedema (37%), 15% reported improved wellbeing. Conclusions: In this real-world cohort, up to 80% of the patients would not meet the eligibility criteria of previous trials due to cancer diagnosis and treatment, gastrointestinal tract function, weight loss criteria or complications such as ascites. This study highlights the heterogeneity in how patients with incurable cancer receive PN, and emphasises the importance of individualised PN treatment, carefully and safely managed to meet the patients’ palliative care situation. Future real-world pragmatic patient-centred protocols bridging the gap between clinical trials and patients in clinical practice are warranted.Keywords
Funding Information
- St. Olav Cancer Fund and St. Olav Research Fund, St. Olavs hospital, Trondheim University Hospital
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Real-world data: bridging the gap between clinical trials and practiceeClinicalMedicine, 2024
- High-protein home parenteral nutrition in malnourished oncology patients: a systematic literature reviewSupportive Care in Cancer, 2023
- ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical Nutrition in cancerClinical Nutrition, 2021
- Home artificial nutrition in palliative care cancer patients: Impact on survival and performance statusClinical Nutrition, 2020
- ESPEN guideline on home parenteral nutritionClinical Nutrition, 2020
- Effects of current parenteral nutrition treatment on health-related quality of life, physical function, nutritional status, survival and adverse events exclusively in patients with advanced cancer: A systematic literature reviewCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2019
- Home parenteral nutrition increases fat free mass in patients with incurable gastrointestinal cancer. Results of a randomized controlled trialClinical Nutrition, 2019
- Home parenteral support in patients with incurable cancer. Patient characteristics of importance for catheter related complications and overall survivalClinical Nutrition ESPEN, 2018
- Home parenteral nutrition for people with inoperable malignant bowel obstructionCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018
- ESPEN guidelines on nutrition in cancer patientsClinical Nutrition, 2017