Short-Term Outcome Comparison of Arthroscopic Chondroplasty and Microfracture for Treatment of Small and Medium-Sized Osteochondral Defects of the Ankle
Open Access
- 1 July 2024
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in International Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
- Vol. 32 (2) , 89-95
Abstract
Background: To compare short-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with small and medium-sized osteochondral ankle defects who were treated with chondroplasty and microfracture. Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicentre ankle and foot arthroscopy registry was queried for patients from December 2017 to December 2022 who were diagnosed with a small or medium-sized osteochondral ankle defect and treated with an arthroscopic chondroplasty or microfracture. Demographic and intraoperative variables were collected. Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sports Subscale (FAAM-S), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), VR-12 Mental, VR-12 Physical and Foot Function Index (FFI) PROMs were completed by patients preoperatively and at a minimum of one year postoperatively. Data were compared between patients who were treated with chondroplasty and those treated with microfracture. The differences in continuous variables were assessed via paired-sample t-tests. χ 2 analysis was performed on all categorical variables. Results: Thirteen patients were treated with chondroplasty, and 22 patients were treated with microfracture. There were no demographic differences between groups (P = 0.30, P = 0.68, P = 0.18). Microfracture patients had significantly deeper chondral defects than chondroplasty patients (P = 0.002), and their lesions had significantly higher International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grades (P = 0.003). There were no differences in length, width or location of defect between groups (P = 0.50, P = 0.73, P = 0.12). Both cohorts saw significant improvement in FAAM-S, VAS, VR-12 Physical and FFI PROMs at a minimum of one year postoperatively (P = 0.00004, P = 0.008, P = 0.010, P = 0.0007; P < 0.00001, P = 0.0001, P = 0.00007, P = 0.0001). There were no differences in any PROM score between groups preoperatively or postoperatively (P = 0.93, P = 0.96, P = 0.57, P = 0.61, P = 0.12; P = 0.79, P = 0.52, P = 0.26, P = 0.46, P = 0.83). Conclusion: There were no significant outcome differences in patients treated with chondroplasty and microfracture for small to medium-sized chondral ankle defects. Patients in both groups saw significant improvements in PROMs at a minimum of one year postoperatively. In small and medium-sized chondral lesions, microfracture may be recommended over chondroplasty for lesions with greater depth or ICRS grade. Level of Evidence: III, retrospective cohort study.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of an Adapted Version of the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey for Older Adults Living in Long-Term Care HomesThe Gerontologist, 2023
- Surgical Treatment for Osteochondral Lesions of the TalusArthroscopy, 2021
- The effect of osteochondral lesion size and ankle joint position on cartilage behavior - numerical and in vitro experimental resultsMedical Engineering & Physics, 2021
- Outcomes Following Ankle Microfracture SurgeryArthroscopy, 2014
- Outcome of Arthroscopic Debridement and Microfracture as the Primary Treatment for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talar DomeArthroscopy, 2012
- Cartilage Lesions in Anterior Bony Impingement of the AnkleArthroscopy, 2010
- Osteochondral defects in the ankle: why painful?Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2010
- Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: a systematic reviewKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2009
- Osteochondral Lesions: Medial Versus Lateral, Persistent Pain, Cartilage Restoration Options and IndicationsFoot and Ankle Clinics, 2009
- International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) and Oswestry macroscopic cartilage evaluation scores validated for use in Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) and microfractureOsteoarthritis and Cartilage, 2007