Does atypical work help the jobless? Evidence from a CAEAS/CPS cohort analysis
Authors:
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Applied Economics
- Vol. 41 (9) , 1077-1087
Abstract
Atypical employment, such as temporary, on-call and contract work, has been found disproportionately to attract the jobless. But there is no consensus in the literature as to the labour market consequences of such job choice by unemployed individuals. Using data from the Current Population Survey, we investigate the implications of the initial job-finding strategies pursued by the jobless for their short- and medium-term employment stability. At first sight, it appears that taking an offer of regular employment provides the greatest degree of employment continuity for the jobless. However, closer inspection indicates that the jobless who take up atypical employment are not only more likely to be employed 1 month and 1 year later than those who continue to search, but also to enjoy employment continuity that is not less favourable than that offered by regular, open-ended employment.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- The use of alternative work arrangements by the jobless: Evidence from the CAEAS/CPSJournal of Labor Research, 2006
- Welfare to Temporary Work: Implications for Labor Market OutcomesReview of Economics and Statistics, 2005
- Temporary Jobs: Stepping Stones or Dead Ends?The Economic Journal, 2002
- Why Do Temporary Help Firms Provide Free General Skills Training?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001
- A Note on Longitudinally Matching Current Population Survey (CPS) Respondents1999
- Alternative and Part‐Time Employment Arrangements as a Response to Job LossJournal of Labor Economics, 1999
- The expansion of temporary help employment in the US, 1982-1992: a test of alternative economic explanationsApplied Economics, 1996