Who Benefits from Store Brand Entry?
Authors:
- 1 August 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Marketing Science
- Vol. 23 (3) , 364-390
Abstract
Store brand entry has become a key issue in marketing as it may structurally change the performance of and the interactions among all market players. Based on their multivariate time-series analysis, the authors demonstrate permanent performance effects of store brand entry, typically benefiting the retailer, the consumers, and premium-brand manufacturers, while harming second-tier brand manufacturers. For the retailer, they consistently find two beneficial effects of store brand entry: high unit margins on the store brand itself and higher unit margins on the national brands. This increase in unit margins implies that the retailer strengthens its bargaining position vis-à-vis national brand manufacturers. However, store brand entry only rarely yields category expansion and does not create store traffic or revenue benefits. Second, consumers do not obtain lower prices on all national brands, only on some second-tier brands. However, they benefit from enlarged product assortment and intensified promotional activity that lowers average price paid for two out of four categories. For the manufacturers, store brand entry is typically beneficial for premium-price national brands, but not for second-tier national brands. Often, premium brands experience lower long-term price sensitivity and higher revenues, whereas second-tier brands experience higher long-term price sensitivity and lower revenues.Keywords
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Market share response and competitive interaction: The impact of temporary, evolving and structural changes in pricesInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2000
- Long-run effects of price promotions in scanner marketsJournal of Econometrics, 1998
- Modeling the Demand for M3 in the Unified GermanyReview of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- Decline and variability in brand loyaltyInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 1997
- PRACTITIONERS CORNER: Tests for Cointegration in Models with Regime and Trend ShiftsOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1996
- There Is No Aggregation Bias: Why Macro Logit Models WorkJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1991
- Manufacturer Trade Deals and Retail Price PromotionsJournal of Marketing Research, 1990
- MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION AND INFERENCE ON COINTEGRATION — WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DEMAND FOR MONEYOxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1990
- First-mover advantagesStrategic Management Journal, 1988
- Robust Tests for the Equality of VariancesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1974