A Comparative Study of Pse/Catego and Diasika: Two Psychiatric Computer Diagnostic Systems
Authors:
- W. SchmidWSW. Schmid
- T. BronischTBT. Bronisch
- D. Von ZerssenDZD. Von Zerssen
- 1 September 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Royal College of Psychiatrists in The British Journal of Psychiatry
- Vol. 141 (3) , 292-295
Abstract
Summary: An unselected series of 100 psychiatric in-patients was independently diagnosed by two clinicians using the PSE and by two computer diagnostic systems: CATEGO based on PSE items and DiaSiKa based on AMDP items. The computer programs are compared with respect to their diagnostic agreement with the clinical diagnoses.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- The AMDP-System1982
- Reliability and Descriptive Validity of PSE SyndromesArchives of General Psychiatry, 1979
- Research Diagnostic CriteriaArchives of General Psychiatry, 1978
- Further studies on interviewer training and inter-rater reliability of the Present State Examination (PSE)Psychological Medicine, 1977
- Reliability of the PSE (ninth edition) used in a population studyPsychological Medicine, 1977
- Reliability and Clinical Utility of the "Wing" Present State ExaminationArchives of General Psychiatry, 1974
- Diagnostic Criteria for Use in Psychiatric ResearchArchives of General Psychiatry, 1972
- DIAGNO II: Further Developments in a Computer Program for Psychiatric DiagnosisAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1969
- The reliability of the ?present state examination?Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 1968
- DIAGNOArchives of General Psychiatry, 1968