Using the Short Physical Performance Battery for Frailty Screenings Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: An ROC Analysis
Authors:
- Eman AliEAEman Ali
- Kworweinski LafontantKLKworweinski Lafontant
- Jethro Raphael M. SuarezJethro Raphael M. Suarez
- Carla Stokes LeinbachCLCarla Stokes Leinbach
- David H. FukudaDavid H. Fukuda
- Jeffrey R. StoutJeffrey R. Stout
- Sergi Garcia-RetortilloSGSergi Garcia-Retortillo
- Janet LopezJanet Lopez
- Rui XieRXRui Xie
- Ladda ThiamwongLadda Thiamwong
Open Access
- 31 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics
- Vol. 74 (2) , 10
Abstract
Frailty is a highly prevalent and adverse syndrome among older adults, and there are many different assessments for screening both frailty (robust + pre-frail vs. frail) and frailty process (robust vs. pre-frail + frail). Previous studies have suggested that the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) can be used as a quick screening tool for frailty, demonstrating excellent agreement when compared to Fried’s phenotype as a criterion. However, to the best of our knowledge, no study has assessed the SPPB’s diagnostic accuracy using the FRAIL questionnaire as the criterion. In this cross-sectional study, we compared frailty (SPPB ≤ 8) and frailty process (SPPB ≤ 10) classifications for 371 community-dwelling older adults (≥60 yrs) by the SPPB to the FRAIL questionnaire using McNemar tables and a receiver operator characteristic analysis. The SPPB and the FRAIL questionnaire significantly differed in their appraisal of both frailty and frailty process (p < 0.001). For frailty, the SPPB scored a sensitivity of 62.9%, a specificity of 78.6%, and an area under the curve of 0.78. In addition, for the frailty process, the SPPB scored a sensitivity of 77.6%, a specificity of 55.3%, and an area under the curve of 0.70. The SPPB demonstrated limited diagnostic accuracy compared to the criterion FRAIL questionnaire. Our findings indicate that the SPPB should not be the sole method of assessing frailty among older adults. To address the complexity of frailty, clinicians should attempt to implement multiple assessments that combine biological, social, and functional aspects of frailty. Pre-registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05778604).Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (R01MD018025)
- NIH Office of the Director (3R01MD018025-02S1)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Frailty and socioeconomic position: A systematic review of observational studiesAgeing Research Reviews, 2024
- Vigor to Frailty As a Continuum—A New Approach in the Study of Muscle, Mobility, and Aging CohortThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2023
- The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB): A Quick and Useful Tool for Fall Risk Stratification Among Older Primary Care PatientsJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partnersJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
- FRAIL Questionnaire Screening Tool and Short-Term Outcomes in Geriatric Fracture PatientsJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2017
- A simple frailty questionnaire (FRAIL) predicts outcomes in middle aged African AmericansThe Journal of nutrition, health and aging, 2012
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Older Men, Social Integration and Organisational ActivitiesSocial Policy and Society, 2003
- Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a PhenotypeThe Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 2001
- A Short Physical Performance Battery Assessing Lower Extremity Function: Association With Self-Reported Disability and Prediction of Mortality and Nursing Home AdmissionJournal of Gerontology, 1994