Early intervention evidence for infants with or at risk for cerebral palsy: an overview of systematic reviews
- 6 April 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
- Vol. 63 (7) , 771-784
Abstract
Aim: To perform an overview of systematic reviews and more recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on early motor interventions in infants aged 0 to 3 years with or at risk of cerebral palsy to inform current clinical and research efforts and provide a benchmark to assess future interventions ideally initiated within the first 6 months.Method: Standardized searches of the PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were conducted for systematic reviews (2009–2020) and RCTs (2015–2020).Results: From 840 unique records, 31 full texts were reviewed, yielding three systematic reviews encompassing 46 studies, 16 with comparison groups, and six additional RCTs that met the criteria. Two enrichment‐ and activity‐based approaches had medium effect sizes on motor development, only one with low risk of bias; two others had large task‐specific effect sizes but some bias concerns; and three enriched environment studies with some bias concerns had medium effect sizes on cognitive development. Most had small or no effect sizes, bias concerns, and uncertain diagnostic determinations.Interpretation: Data synthesis revealed limited data quantity and quality, and suggest, although not yet confirmed, greater benefit from early versus later intervention. Research efforts with greater early diagnostic precision and earlier intervention are accelerating, which may transform future outcomes and practices.What this paper adds: For over 50% of trials within the reviews, the intervention was compared to standard care with only two showing efficacy. Similar to results in older children, constraint‐induced movement therapy (CIMT) emerged as efficacious with high effect sizes. CIMT was not superior to similarly intense bimanual training or occupational therapy. Goals‐Activity‐Motor Enrichment intervention initiated before 5 months of age was superior to equally intense standard care. Several other enriched environment strategies promoted cognitive and/or motor development.Keywords
This publication has 105 references indexed in Scilit:
- Enriched Environments and Motor Outcomes in Cerebral Palsy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysisPediatrics, 2013
- Training to Enhance Walking in Children With Cerebral Palsy: Are We Missing the Window of Opportunity?Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 2013
- Off Label Use of Botulinum Toxin in Children under Two Years of Age: A Systematic ReviewToxins, 2013
- Feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of a novel mobility training intervention in infants and toddlers with cerebral palsyDevelopmental Neurorehabilitation, 2012
- Modified constraint-induced therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a randomized trialDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2011
- Focus on function: a cluster, randomized controlled trial comparing child- versus context-focused intervention for young children with cerebral palsyDevelopmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 2011
- Methodology in conducting a systematic review of systematic reviews of healthcare interventionsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Intervention for infants with brain injury: Results of a randomized controlled studyInfant Behavior and Development, 2006
- Motor outcome differences between two groups of children with spastic diplegia who received different intensities of early onset physiotherapy followed for 5 yearsBrain and Development, 2004
- The Effects of Physical Therapy on Cerebral PalsyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988