Identifying older adults’ communication support needs and preferences: a scoping review of measurement instruments
Authors:
- Asmita V ManchhaAMAsmita V Manchha
- Bridget BurtonBBBridget Burton
- Michelle KingMKMichelle King
- Samantha SiyambalapitiyaSSSamantha Siyambalapitiya
- Joanne M WoodJWJoanne M Wood
- Louise HicksonLHLouise Hickson
- Deirdre FetherstonhaughDFDeirdre Fetherstonhaugh
- Kirstine ShrubsoleKSKirstine Shrubsole
- Geoff ArgusGAGeoff Argus
- Nerina ScarinciNSNerina Scarinci
- Sarah J WallaceSWSarah J Wallace
Open Access
- 7 April 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Gerontologist
- Vol. 66 (6)
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Communication changes in older adults affect independence, social participation, and quality of life. In aged care settings, timely identification of communication support needs and preferences is essential to upholding older people’s rights and ensuring person-centered care, yet communication is not routinely assessed. This scoping review systematically identifies and describes instruments that measure communication support needs and preferences in older adults. Research Design and Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, we searched PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Embase alongside gray literature. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened against eligibility criteria using Covidence. Data on instrument context, content, and administration were extracted and synthesized using content analysis and the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Results: 26 publications describing 29 instruments were included. Instruments were typically condition-specific (e.g., dementia) or impairment-specific (e.g., hearing loss). Communication preferences and personal factors, such as cultural and linguistic background, were rarely considered, and only one instrument assessed both needs and preferences. While self-report instruments were often intended for completion by the older adult, only one offered a communication-accessible version (e.g., easy read text, larger font, visual aids). Discussion and Implications: No existing instrument adequately measures communication support needs and preferences for use in aged care settings. A condition-agnostic instrument is needed that adopts a holistic, biopsychosocial perspective; accounts for the aged care environment; incorporates multiple perspectives; and is communication-accessible. Developing such a measure is a foundational step toward accurate, consistent, and timely identification of the communication needs of older adults in aged care.Keywords
Funding Information
- 2021 MRFF Dementia Ageing and Aged Care Mission
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Communication disorders: A complex population in healthcareLanguage and Health, 2023
- A scoping review of the use of visual tools and adapted easy-read approaches in Quality-of-Life instruments for adultsQuality of Life Research, 2023
- Instruments for assessing the preferences for everyday living of older people with various care needs across different care settings: an evidence mapGeriatric Nursing, 2022
- Cultural responsiveness in applied behavior analysis: Self‐assessmentJournal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 2022
- Impact of an intervention to support hearing and vision in dementia: The SENSE‐Cog Field TrialInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2019
- The Assessment of Language and Communication in Dementia: A Synthesis of EvidenceThe American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2019
- CODEM InstrumentGeroPsych, 2014
- A Guide for Enhancing Patient and Caregiver CommunicationPerspectives on Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 2012
- Communication and AgingPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America, 2010
- The measurement of incapacity in the severely demented elderly: The validation of a behavioural assessment scaleInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 1991