Multiorgan resection for gastric cancer: intraoperative and computed tomography assessment of locally advanced disease is inaccurate
Authors:
- Stuart G. MarcusSMStuart G. Marcus
- Elliot NewmanENElliot Newman
- Russell S. BermanRBRussell S. Berman
- Herman YeeHYHerman Yee
- Spiros P. HiotisSHSpiros P. Hiotis
- 1 November 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
- Vol. 8 (7) , 897-900
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Value of computed tomography in addition to ultrasound for preoperative staging of gastric cancerEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2002
- Extended Local Resection for Advanced Gastric CancerAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Achieving R0 Resection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: is It Worth the Risk of Multiorgan Resection?1Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2002
- Staging of Gastric CancerSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002
- A comparison of computerised tomography, laparoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound in the preoperative staging of oesophago-gastric carcinomaEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2002
- A systematic review of the staging performance of endoscopic ultrasound in gastro-oesophageal carcinomaGut, 2001
- Preoperative Multivariate Prediction of Morbidity After Gastrectomy for AdenocarcinomaAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2000
- Is there a benefit of pancreaticosplenectomy with gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer?The American Journal of Surgery, 2000
- Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Risk factors for surgical treatment in the Dutch gastric cancer trialBritish Journal of Surgery, 1997