The Dialogics of Legal Meaning: Spectacular Trials, the Unwritten Law, and Narratives of Criminal Responsibility
Author:
- Martha Merrill UmphreyMUMartha Merrill Umphrey
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Law & Society Review
- Vol. 33 (2) , 393-423
Abstract
Drawing upon Mikhail Bakhtin's theory of the dialogic, this essay explores the production of legal meanings about criminal responsibility in the 19th and early 20th centuries. In particular, it examines the honor-based defense of the “unwritten law” as it was articulated in relation to the formal law of provocation in the 19th century, and in the 1906 trial of Harry K. Thaw for the murder of Stanford White. Meanings about criminal responsibility emerge, I argue, from a process of discursive conflict and negotiation between the domains of legal consciousness and formal law. At trial, competing narratives of indictment and exoneration literally enact that dynamic process, so that trials may be said to be the materialization of the dialogic production of “law” in its broadest sense.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Learning from the Confucian heritage: so size doesn’t matter?International Journal of Educational Research, 1998
- Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients1995
- Subversive Stories and Hegemonic Tales: Toward a Sociology of NarrativeLaw & Society Review, 1995
- The Trial of Madame Caillaux1992
- Murders and Madness1991
- Sob Sister Journalism1990
- The Libertine Must Die: Sexual Dishonor and the Unwritten Law in the Nineteenth-Century United StatesJournal of Social History, 1989
- The Need of a Sociological JurisprudenceCrime & Delinquency, 1964
- A Bill to Regulate Expert TestimonyJournal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology, 1915
- The Law of HomicideColumbia Law Review, 1907